Minnehaha County Sheriff Mike Milstead announces retirement – Sheriff’s seat is an open race in 2026

Well this is a surprise that casual observers were not expecting.

On Greg Belfrage’s show on KELO radio this morning, (As per the Argus Leader) Minnehaha County Sheriff Mike Milstead just announced he will not be a candidate in 2026. Making it a wide open race:

After nearly 30 years behind the badge, Mike Milstead says he will not run for re-election and will retire at the end of his term.

In a surprise appearance made Jan. 28 on KELO’s Greg Belfrage weekday morning podcast, Milstead said this is a “huge step” for him.

“I’ve done this since I was 18 years old,” said Milstead. “If you saw me right now, you’d see I have tears in my eyes. I love this community and continue to do the best I can to serve. But I’m ready.

and..

He filed for re-election six times without ever facing an opponent.

Read the entire story here.

After holding the job for an incredible and successful 31-year stretch, that may set things up for a very active election in both the primary and the general.

Stay tuned for more on this as it develops.

Guest Column: TARs Reborn! by Catherine Barranco, 2025 TARs State Adviser

TARs Reborn!
by TARs Adviser Catherine Barranco

Nine months ago, I was chosen State Adviser of the South Dakota Teenage Republicans (SD TARs), embarking upon a mission to breathe life back into a once vibrant organization that had unfortunately gone dormant. With the new year underway, I’d like to report on the incredible success we achieved and make an exciting announcement for the future!

The first thing that pops to mind whenever anyone mentions TARs is Camp….. and what a camp it was!  This year included many fan-favorites: Mt Rushmore, WaTiki Waterpark, karaoke night, nature hike, talent show, tubing in the creek, and a lovely banquet dinner.  We added instant hits, including Rush Mountain Adventure Park, media training, Legislative Page and Roberts Rules education as well as a discussion of conservative principles that define what it means to be Republican. We hosted exclusive events with legislators and supporters: the Fast Pitch Forum and Ice Cream Caucus.  A number of Constitutional Officers spoke, and for the first time EVER, all four of South Dakota’s top elected officials — U.S. Senator John Thune, U.S. Senator Mike Rounds, Governor Larry Rhoden, and U.S. Representative Dusty Johnson — personally visited to address our campers!

Throughout 2025, TARs was visibly active statewide.  Executive board members and I spoke at a dozen meetings hosted by county GOPs and/or Republican Women clubs.  We supported events across the state, including Brookings, Lincoln, Meade, Bon Homme, and Codington Lincoln Day Dinners.  Often, TARs volunteers served the food, refilled the pitchers, and cleared the tables!

We joined the GOP at fairs, including the State Fair, as well as the Brookings GOP Picnic.  For the first time in recent memory, TARs participated in Christmas at the Capitol.  As thousands of visitors walked the hallowed halls — admiring trees full of Christmas cheer — they saw the name “South Dakota Teenage Republicans.”

In addition to hosting and participating in events around the state, we built infrastructure.  We began an ongoing collaboration with Call to Freedom, instituting new child-protection protocols. We doubled membership and debuted our new commitment cards.  We opened TARs’ bank account and email address, relaunched TARs’ social media, adopted a new TARs logo, and printed TARs stationary and “Raised Right” stickers to distribute.  We created new online forms for donations, volunteer requests, membership, and event registration, each complete with its own QR Code.  We launched a marketing campaign that included promotional videos, flyers, brochures, two large vinyl banners, as well as articles in print media and online blogs. We smashed fundraising records!  We started with nothing, but thanks to your generous monetary and in-kind donations, we accomplished a tremendous amount and still ended the year with over $5,000!!

It’s been an incredible comeback, and none of it would have been possible without the support of so many: the South Dakota Federation of Republican Women, state and county GOPs, donors, elected officials, and a fantastic executive board, especially Kayla Randall and Aidyn Melville, who succeeded her as Chair at the conclusion of Camp.

Finally, I’m excited to announce that Kayla Randall is taking over as TARs Adviser!  Kayla graduated high school in May. With her many years of experience as a TARs member and officer, Kayla is well poised to build upon the success we’ve enjoyed. I am confident Kayla and her board will lead TARs into the future.  Please join me in congratulating Kayla and wishing her well in this important endeavor!

Grateful for all your support,

Catherine Barranco
2025 TARs State Adviser

 

After this interim’s debacle, looks like they’re erasing Garcia’s Medical Marijuana oversight mess

Remember this last interim’s Medical Marijuana Oversight Committee led by Representative Garcia which was a clown show – and many other committee sessions were as well?

Not from today’s hearing, but on 10/22 at the end of the meeting, representing Watertown, State Representative Josephine Garcia apparently had quite the rant, where she talks about masturbation:

Umm.. yeah.. Not a comment that we usually hear from someone during a committee hearing.

Otherwise, I do like the part where she says she may not come back.

Read that here.

It appears the decision of whether Garcia could returns as the chair of that committee could be taken out of her hands.

State Representative Tim Goodwin has introduced a measure to make the whole thing go away.

Getting Rep. Garcia out of any positions of authority and reducing bureaucracy sounds like a win in anyone’s book.

Now if they could only get a better State Rep. for District 5?

Guest Column: South Dakota’s Future Depends on Smart Growth—Not Fear of It by Tyler Tordsen

South Dakota’s Future Depends on Smart Growth—Not Fear of It
by Tyler Tordsen, President & CEO, Sioux Metro Growth Alliance

SIOUX FALLS, SD – South Dakotans are right to care deeply about the future of our communities. We value self-reliance, common sense, and stewardship of our land, tax dollars, and way of life. Lately, I’ve grown increasingly concerned by the rising anti-growth sentiment across our state. Too often, it’s fueled not by facts, but by misinformation and a growing distrust of government.

That frustration is real. People want lower taxes, especially property taxes, and they want relief for families, farmers, and small business owners who are also feeling the pinch. At the same time, we’re increasingly resistant to new housing, infrastructure, and economic development projects that could expand the tax base and help ease that burden over time. We can’t continue to demand tax relief while blocking the very growth that makes it possible.

One of the most common narratives I hear is that economic development in South Dakota only benefits large, out-of-state corporations. It’s nothing more than “corporate welfare,” handouts, or giveaways for million-dollar projects, while locals are left behind. I understand why that perception exists. But I can also tell you, from direct experience, that it doesn’t reflect reality.

In my work with the Sioux Metro Growth Alliance, our focus is exactly the opposite. We exist to help communities, entrepreneurs, and businesses of all sizes, large and small, rural or urban, navigate available resources and pursue responsible growth. Whether it’s a small-town infrastructure need, a local business expansion, or a housing project that helps a community remain viable, our role is to connect people to tools that might already exist and ensure they have a fair shot, regardless of their ZIP code or size of their balance sheet.

There are no freebies. There are no giveaways. Every grant, loan, or incentive comes with accountability, local investment, and long-term expectations. When done right, economic development is not about picking winners and losers, it’s about leveling the playing field and giving communities and their people the same opportunity to succeed here.

In my opinion, the bigger issue is that we don’t do a good enough job telling these smaller success stories, connecting our locals with what already exists for them, and selling the bigger picture of what makes our state so great. When a local business expands with the help of a revolving loan fund, workforce program, or infrastructure investment, we should be celebrating that success just as loudly as we do a $100-million announcement. Don’t get me wrong, those big projects matter too. Many of South Dakota’s largest employers and most successful companies started small or started somewhere else before establishing roots here. In fact, over 80% of economic growth in South Dakota comes from the expansion of businesses who are already here.

My point is that economic development is not the enemy — pushing growth with poor communication or projects with lack of proper consultation is.

Unfortunately, there are those who continue to sow distrust by reducing economic development to catchy buzzwords and false narratives with rhetoric not rooted in sincere concern for taxpayers or communities, but in political gain. That approach may generate clicks or applause lines, but it does nothing to solve real challenges or move South Dakota forward.

The truth is, South Dakota has nearly everything going for it – still! We have some of the hardest-working, most innovative people you can find. We enjoy a very accessible government at all levels, a comparatively low tax burden, a high quality of life, and values that run deep across many generations. People want change, but they also want to preserve what makes this place special. I understand that tension, and I share it.

But the “good old days” didn’t happen by accident. They were built by people willing to invest, adapt, and think long-term. With better communication, transparency, and a commitment to responsible growth, I believe our best days are still ahead.

After more than a century of leading with our values, we can’t expect South Dakota to remain a hidden gem forever. That doesn’t mean saying “yes” to everything that comes our way, but it also can’t mean blindly saying “no” to everything either. We’ve earned the right to be selective in supporting the right projects that are mutually beneficial for all. Smart, strategic growth in the right places should be welcomed, not feared.

If we get this right, we improve our chances of being able to lower or stabilize our taxes. More importantly, we create real opportunities for our children and grandchildren to stay here, or to recruit them back home, and to have the opportunity for them to succeed in any field they might pursue.

We must commit to doing a better job of working together in shaping South Dakota’s priorities and issues. We now live in the most digitally connected era in history and each carry some responsibility for educating ourselves on what’s before us. By working more closely with our neighbors, communicating honestly, and choosing to seek progress over paralysis, I know we can keep South Dakota the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

Tyler Tordsen, President & CEO, Sioux Metro Growth Alliance

Rep. Dylan Jordan anti-development resolution goes down in House.

While I was watching Senator Mykala Voita’s state-sponsored “Ramadan in July” resolution pass the Senate (22-11), at least one of the chambers had some sense today.

State Representative Dylan “DJ Jazzy” Jordan’s anti-development resolution – HCR 6007 – which tried to send a signal that we don’t like jobs and development in South Dakota – was shot down on a vote of 29-37. On nearly a straight-line pro-jobs economic development versus the anti-development group in the chamber.   (Rep. Goodwin – what are you doing? You’re killing me.)

This marks the third Rep. Jordan measure to go down in flames. 3 4 down, 3 2 remaining to be heard (maybe less.. I didn’t catch what happened to HB 1071 in House Transportation this AM.  *Correction. 1071 was killed 9-1)

Sen. Voita’s Senate Concurrent Resolution 604 measure up today – Just call it what it is “Ramadan in July.”

The Senate Agenda for today has been posted, and the very first on the list is District 21 State Senator Mykayla Voita’s Senate Concurrent Resolution 604 is first on the list.

In case you had forgotten, I mentioned it earlier..

Senator Voita and her end-time army resolution by Pat Powers

Voita has introduced a 4 page resolution requesting everyone pray and fast in July, “depriving ourselves of those temporary physical comforts.” (What about fireworks? Is her version of jesus-government still going to allow us to do fireworks in July?).

And for the “the Paraclete to move within the halls of government, classrooms, businesses…,” etc.

Read that here.

Under that post, in the comments, a reader had picked up on a big item I hadn’t even considered:

The learned senator, in effect, wants to culturally appropriate Islam’s holy month, which is the ninth month of their calendar, move it to the seventh month, and sanction it–by the State–as a Christian practice of worship. I doubt whether a concurrent resolution has ever had a fiscal note. But this one deserves a fiscal note. South Dakota sales tax revenues rely on the taxation of food, both at the grocery store and in the restaurant. Those two industries, hopefully, will oppose this measure, or in the future there could be layoffs during the month.

Read that here.

Um..  well looking at the resolution..

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call upon all those who are physically able and spiritually inclined to join us annually during the month of July, for a time of prayer and fasting, depriving ourselves of those temporary physical comforts so that we may be awakened to our need and hunger for God, humbling ourselves before Him, prayerfully seeking His face, asking for His forgiveness, forsaking all wickedness, and begging Him to bestow His healing, blessing, grace, and mercy upon us, so that we, our communities, our state, and our nation will be transformed into a people fit to be His own.

and comparing it to an explanation of what Ramadan is to non-practitioners..

Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. It is observed by Muslims worldwide as a month of fasting (sawm), communal prayer (salah), reflection, and community. It is also the month in which the Quran is believed to have been revealed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The annual observance of Ramadan is regarded as one of the five pillars of Islam and lasts twenty-nine to thirty days, from one sighting of the crescent moon to the next.

Read that here.

I find myself challenged to disagree with the commenter’s thesis that Senator Voita is trying to create a funky Christian appropriation of Ramadan in July in South Dakota, as sponsored by the state. Because that’s what she’s proposing.

I think Christians and Muslims should be free to worship in the way they choose. But first and foremost, we can follow the US Constitution, keep church and state separate, and we don’t need Voita’s “Ramadan in July” resolution or any other Christian, Muslim, Buddist, etc. religious resolutions being promoted by the state legislature.

To each their own. Let’s all get along without the legislative coercion.

 

Governor Requests Presidential Disaster Declaration Following Windstorm

Governor Requests Presidential Disaster Declaration Following Windstorm

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, Governor Larry Rhoden has formally requested a presidential major disaster declaration for South Dakota in response to a historic, record-breaking winter windstorm that caused widespread damage across Custer, Fall River, and Pennington counties on December 17 and 18, 2025.

“Our communities faced extraordinary conditions during this storm with severe impacts, especially in rural and frontier areas,” said Governor Larry Rhoden. “This support will help local communities, reduce the financial burden on electric ratepayers, and ensure essential services can be restored and strengthened for the future.”

The storm produced sustained high winds and extreme gusts exceeding 90 mph in parts of western South Dakota, downing trees and power lines, damaging public infrastructure, and leaving thousands of residents without power for days. The Black Hills region was particularly impacted. Difficult terrain and extensive forest damage significantly delayed power restoration efforts and access for emergency responders.

Governor Rhoden previously signed an emergency declaration on January 7, 2026, which started the disaster process by requesting technical assistance for a preliminary damage assessment by FEMA. Those preliminary damage assessments conducted from January 20 to 22 confirmed more than $4.6 million in public infrastructure damage across the three counties, exceeding federal thresholds for disaster assistance. Damage included roads, power systems, parks, recreation areas, trails, and public facilities, with Custer County experiencing particularly devastating per-capita impacts.

If approved, the Presidential declaration would provide Public Assistance funding for Custer, Fall River, and Pennington counties for repairs at a cost share of 75% federal, 10% state, and 15% local. In addition, it would make Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funding available in the future.

###

Why did legislators form a “dark money” organization for purposes of lobbying and endorsing candidates?

Had this sent to me a short time back. Articles of Incorporation were filed in the fall of last year for a new group – a domestic non-profit – called American Land & Legacy which is fronted by Amanda Radtke, a self-styled social media influencer who is always pushing her narrative du jour in conservative Republican facebook groups.

Has Radtke filed an LLC to potentially monetize her facebook outrage? I’d say “who cares,” but it’s more of who she’s bringing along for the ride. And what kind of rabbit-hole it represents.  The two related entities organized last October are as follows:

For our purposes, we’re looking at NS311623. (You can look at it yourself, these are very public filings). And looking at the filing, there’s a couple of items that drew my attention:

First off is that this group has organized itself, indicating that the purpose for that organization is “Participating in C4 actions such as political involvement, lobbying, and endorsing candidates for public office.”  So – their words – they came together for lobbying and endorsing candidates.

Who is the “they?”  Here’s where it gets more curious.

Included on the initial board of directors for this lobbying organization were State Rep. Julie Auch, State Senator Mark Lapka, and State Rep. Kayley Nolz.  So hang on.. 3 legislators are directors of an organization that stated that they will have political involvement such as lobbying and endorsing candidates for public office?  And they will be raising money for this purpose, or taking money from parties unknown for this purpose?

Why does that make me ask what’s going on here, and wonder what conflicts might arise from being a director in this corporation?  There’s no IRS 990 filing available yet as it was just formed, so we know little of what they seem to describe as a 501 (c)(4) group. But with elected officials involved, it makes you wonder how the money flows, and who it flows to, and what it’s being used for?

Since this initial filing in October, on November 3, State Rep. Julie Auch was replaced on the board with a non-legislator. And on January 1, Radtke signed paperwork to remove her sister Rep. Kayley Nolz. Which leaves Senator Mark Lapka on the board of directors of an organization which was formed to be involved politically and “lobbying, and endorsing candidates for public office.”

Here’s the thing about 501c4 organizations – and I learned this long ago when one was involved in a ballot measure 20 years back – They can get away with not disclosing how they raised and spent their money for a long, long time, if at all.   In fact, they have a term for groups like this – political Dark Money. If you’re looking at how some people view dark money… From the Campaign Legal Center:

“Dark money” groups are political organizations that masquerade as “social welfare nonprofits” under section 501(c)(4) of federal tax law, allowing them to avoid having to disclose where any of their money came from. Wealthy special interests use these groups to pour cash into elections and influence legislation in their favor, while keeping their involvement totally secret.

…. Federal campaign finance laws provide that any group with a “major purpose” of engaging in federal campaign activity must disclose its contributors, and federal tax laws provide that political activity cannot be a 501(c)(4) nonprofit group’s “primary activity.”

If a group wants to work primarily on politics, it must register as a political committee and disclose its donors.

Dark money groups get away with breaking the law because the two federal agencies charged with overseeing political activity and nonprofits, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), are doing practically nothing to stop them.

Read that here.

Now, that’s how they are said to operate on the federal level. At the state level, there have been attempts to rein in this kind of activity, but I’d have to consult someone to get the current state of regulation.

The bottom line is why did these legislators think they needed to organize a 501(c)(4) federal dark money group to “lobby” and “endorse candidates for public office?” Clearly, a couple of them got out of it right away. But the whole organization is there, still with a State Senator on the Board of Directors according to the latest amendment.

In what might be the biggest election year in a generation, it brings up many questions. Unanswered questions as to why they’re using an unusual tool in South Dakota politics to make it challenging to follow the money.