Secretary of State website updated with Monae Johnson masthead, other changes coming as we come full circle.

From, the masthead for the South Dakota Secretary of State’s website is now updated, and showing signs that a new Secretary of State is in office:

What other changes will we see? I did catch in one of her speeches that Secretary Johnson mentioned we should have greater campaign finance disclosure to allow donors to be searchable on the SDSOS website. Which I found extremely interesting, as the capability was there at one point, only to be removed.

The ability to search donors across the entire system was put in place after Secretary of State Jason Gant took office back in 2011, in the form of the “C.A.S.H.” system as implemented by the office at the time:

For open government and those who research donations, it was revolutionary and an absolute boon. The problem? Legislators hated it. They really hated it.

In the start, legislators were required to go into the system and key their donations in, or upload a spreadsheet. This represented a big change to the procedure under Chris Nelson as Secretary of State where they just sent in a paper form.   Change is hard, especially for those in the legislature who lean away from the younger portion of the age scale.  There was resistance in going fully electronic from some. Another part was that was for the system to automatically account and to trigger reporting when you hit the $100 threshold for reporting. So it required all small donor amounts to be put in the system, and that also brought pushback from those who didn’t like the smaller donors being entered.  And, there was a person or two who didn’t care for the disclosure that the system brought, because the system also provided the same transparency to Political Action Committees.  If you were juggling things across several PACS, it made it pretty easy to ferret that out, and there were those who didn’t like that.

After some time battling complaints of those who held the purse strings, there were changes made.  Paper forms could be submitted if so desired, and they would be entered into the C.A.S.H. system, keypunched by SOS employees. But the handwriting was on the wall with enough elected officials disliking aspects of the new system.

When Secretary of State Shantel Krebs took office, the entire system was shelved, and a system put in place that at the time had worse lookup capability than what was available under SOS Nelson, and would pull up the once again paper forms that legislators would mail and fax in. Since it’s earliest form, the system has been slightly improved and refined in the eight years it has been in operation, but at it’s heart, it is largely a simple lookup tool for paper forms.

A decade later, we’re now back full circle. With landmines that I suspect are still there, but still a call for voters wanting to have the ability to know more about our elections.

If Secretary of State Monae Johnson wants to improve the system as she has mentioned with greater disclosure, there are a few hurdles she has to cross, mainly in how she would get the information in, and who would do the input? And how to make it user friendly.

But, increasing transparency and open government is always a good thing.

4 thoughts on “Secretary of State website updated with Monae Johnson masthead, other changes coming as we come full circle.”

  1. What about a process that when you create a PAC or begin to campaign for office, that you must by law, establish a Public Bank Account, which all funds received must be deposited to, of which the Secretary fo State has access to review, audit, at any given time, hence easier to download statements of the account to the Secretary of State database and website. When you register your campaign with the office, the office already has the ability to inspect your records, so why not find a way to utilize bank records to upload, let alone allowing the “State” the ability to inspect the bank records, in order to review, audit, and upload documents. “WE” do this already with other aspects of government at local levels where the city’s have access to bank accounts for contracted partners, venues, and shared accounts such as with TIF Programs. Essentually, ‘as we create a political campaign as an individual or PAC these “financial accounts” are, or should be a public record, one of wihch under S.D.C.L 1-27 can be governed by the State, and kept private between the SOS and Parties Involved other than what is allowed to be published on the State Website (or database).

    So if Mike Zitterich elects to nominate himself for an Elected Position, and makes known of Collecting Campaign Donations, he would have to contract with a State recognized bank to deposit all campaign funds, let alone give permission to the SOS to also observe, and over see the account in order to govern over the funds with the right to publish the data.

    Therefore, you may not need to create an expensive operating system, other than when someone requests an open record search, the SOS may pull directly from the Bank Account. This could also be paid for by means of the Bank Income Tax assessed to the banks in order to be maintained.

    Opinions? Thought?

  2. Some thoughts and opinions. Thanks for considering them.

    Website updated – so it is verified that Johnson has the wheel.

    I would like to advocate for a crowd-sourced 100% voter role canvass.

    I can see a context in which the evidence presented in a hearing at the Capitol earlier this year constitute the need for unprecedented emergency funding (the proceedings have been published in video format). Hire, train, audit 2022 election results to fine tune hand count numbers (key performance indicator is optimal precinct size for parallel hand count efficiency).

    Commence a historic effort to shore-up election quality in South Dakota.

    Purge the voter roles immediately, start from scratch?

  3. Yes, by all means, let’s make it easier to harass individual donors for their support of candidates.

Comments are closed.