US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: Demonizing and Defunding Police Has Consequences

Demonizing and Defunding Police Has Consequences
By Sen. John Thune

American communities are less safe today than they were a year ago. Crime rates have surged since “defund the police” became a rallying cry. It’s no coincidence that cities that have slashed their police budgets have seen huge increases in violence. As of the end of May, Portland, Oregon, was on track to exceed 1,000 shootings for this year. In the first 14 weeks of 2021, New York City shootings were up 81 percent. In Oakland, California, carjackings are up almost 88 percent. Unfortunately, these are just a few examples.

The crime surge is real, and it is frightening. Statistics and percentages can seem abstract, but there are people behind every one of those crimes. People whose lives have been cut short or ravaged by violence. People whose sense of safety has been destroyed.

This won’t be a surprise to most South Dakotans, who overwhelmingly support our law enforcement officers, but defunding the police is a terrible idea. Some of the cities who cut their own police funding are even recognizing the mistake they’ve made and seeking to restore funding they cut. Unfortunately, the problem won’t necessarily be fixed that easily. Because the “defund the police” movement has not just resulted in smaller police budgets, it has also resulted in lower police morale, leading to a wave of police retirements and resignations.

Now, police departments are worried about having enough officers to keep their communities safe. It turns out that when you spend months vilifying police officers and demonizing them for doing their jobs, some of them no longer want to stay. To me, this is perhaps the worst consequence of the defund the police movement. Resources and equipment can be built back up again, but it’s a lot harder to replace good, seasoned officers – particularly right now, when it’s difficult to imagine why anyone would want to become a police officer. Why would men and women sign up for a job where they are regularly characterized as the worst kind of criminals? The sickening scene of protesters shouting “death to police” outside a hospital where two ambushed law enforcement officers were fighting for their lives has to be emblazoned on the minds of police officers nationwide.

The defund the police movement unjustly paints the entire law enforcement community as corrupt and immoral. We all know that simply isn’t true. Police officers are heroes in their communities – brave and committed Americans who put on the badge each day knowing the risk to their own safety. These are the people we call when we have a car accident, see someone in trouble or in need, or fear for our safety. These are the people who run toward danger and violence when the natural reaction is to run away from it. Our law enforcement officers deserve the highest level of respect.

Now, are there bad police officers out there? Of course there are. There are bad teachers out there too. And bad social workers. And bad businessmen. But just as it would be outrageous to demonize all teachers because of the few bad apples in their profession, it is outrageous to demonize the hundreds of thousands of dedicated Americans defending public safety because of a handful of bad officers.

We owe our men and women in law enforcement a great debt – a debt we can’t even fully comprehend. These men and women go out and risk their lives every day of the week, every month of the year, to keep us safe. And they bear a heavy physical and emotional burden. It’s tough to have to see evil on a daily basis – to spend years rescuing children who are in trouble or supporting victims of violence or bringing rapists to justice. They confront violence so that we don’t have to – and they pay a price. We owe them and their families our profound gratitude.

Democrats bear a substantial amount of responsibility for this situation. Far too many of them actively supported the “defund the police” movement and encouraged resentment toward law enforcement. It is disgraceful that anti-police rhetoric has become such an accepted part of our national conversation – and has been winked at or endorsed by so many Democrat leaders. We owe our police officers much better.

If any good can come out of all this violence and heartbreak, I hope it’s an increased recognition of how essential police officers are to keeping our communities safe and a rejection of any idea of defunding the police. It’s time to focus on protecting public safety and honoring the men and women who spend every day working to promote it.

###

Congressman Dusty Johnson’s Weekly Column: Not Perfect, but Progress

Not Perfect, but Progress
By Rep. Dusty Johnson
July 16, 2021

In Congress, hardly anything is perfect. But just because it’s not perfect, doesn’t mean there’s not progress.

This past week we made progress for South Dakota.

The first comes following the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) decision to walk back plans to change the city status of Rapid City.

In January, OMB began toying with the idea to increase the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) qualification from 50,000 to 100,000 people. This set off the alarm bells in smaller cities across the country, including ours.

Upon learning of this proposal, I led several of my House colleagues to introduce theMetropolitan Statistical Area Preservation Act to preserve the more than 140 MSAs from losing their classification.

Rapid City is a robust, growing city – and it deserves the resources that come with being classified as an MSA. Following my legislative push, I’m glad to see the city’s classification is safe.

Secondly, the USDA announced two much needed and frankly overdue investments for our regional cattle producers to help level the playing field.

The first is a program to help expand meat processing capacity for small cattle processers which mirrors the Butcher Block Act that I recently introduced.

The second is the implementation of my bill – the Small Packer Overtime & Holiday Fee Relief for COVID-19 Act – leveling the regulatory playing field for small meat processors running extra shifts.

While we still have a long way to go, these programs will certainly get us one step closer to a fairer cattle market.

As reflected in both the OMB and USDA announcements, common-ground and common-sense proposals can be achieved in Washington.

It’s easy to get swept up in the more partisan issues of the day, but it’s important to acknowledge the small victories. This time, we made progress for cattle producers and residents of Rapid City.

###

Governor Kristi Noem’s Weekly Column: Learning from Our Mistakes

Learning from Our Mistakes
By: Governor Kristi Noem
July 16, 2021

One of the main reasons why we study history is to learn from both our triumphs and our mistakes. Sometimes those mistakes are painful to admit, but we study them nonetheless so that we can ensure that they are never repeated. That’s why students learn about the Holocaust. That’s why we study the atrocity of American slavery and the Civil War that great leaders like President Lincoln fought to end it. It’s also important that our state and our nation know about the tragic story of early Indian boarding schools.

Indian boarding schools were created in 1860 in a purported effort to assimilate Indian children into American culture. From 1860, when the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) established its first Indian boarding school, throughout a majority of the 1900’s, many Indian children were forcibly removed from their homes and families and placed into these BIA schools. They were prohibited from (or punished for) speaking their language or practicing their traditions. Countless Indian children never came home, overcome by sickness and harsh conditions, and many of those who survived the boarding school experience struggled to share their traumatic memories.

The history of Indian boarding schools is not well known outside of Indian Country. However, the Tribes sharing borders with South Dakota suffered losses of their children. The accounting of children who died at these schools is inadequate at best. Mass burials, unmarked graves, and poorly kept death records haunt family histories.

In meetings with the tribes, I heard stories of heartbreak, appreciated the need for closure on this part of their history, and respected how important it was to have these children appropriately identified and returned to their homelands. I worked with the Army to help facilitate this long process of repatriating these children.

Our Tribes in South Dakota have been working diligently to retrace the steps of their lost children and will be repatriating their remains to lay them to rest in their homelands.  This week, the first children will be brought home to South Dakota and to Rosebud. As I continue to be made aware of Dakota and Lakota children being repatriated, I’m happy to see those early efforts have yielded results.

It is with great sincerity that my family and I offer our thoughts and prayers to the families and to the Tribes in South Dakota as they conduct their ceremonies for those coming home, and we are with them until all their children are returned.

###

Brookings Schools proposing changing terminology from ‘student’ to ‘learner.’ Despite state law not using the term.

A school board agenda was sent out in the last couple of days from the Brookings School District which might be one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of.   As opposed to focusing on something that matters, they’re wasting time on terminology and where policies once talked about “students,” they’re scratching it out and writing “learners.”

For example:

Looking around, it seems to have been taking place for a while. And at least from first blush, it appears this effort might be springing forth from the Associated School Boards of South Dakota:

I’m sure calling them learners as opposed to students will be all warmer and fuzzier, and will make us feel better about ourselves… but what about state law?

While state law might talk about learners permits, or ‘english learner’ as someone who is not a native speaker, it really doesn’t use learner in the context of a child in school. State law calls them “students.” Period.

So why would the Associated School Boards be pushing this, given the language contained in law?  Are they going to bring legislation this next session to change “student” to “learner” wherever it appears?  Or are they advocating the Brookings School District and other school districts across the state use language in their policies and procedures which differs from what’s in state law?

Because it sounds darned .. unnecessary.

SD Democrat & Labor Union cash being filtered through another PAC to attack Governor Noem with billboards

The Argus Leader has an article up this AM noting how a political action committee is attacking Governor Noem, comparing her vote total in a non-presidential election to the number of votes that marijuana legalization received in the year of the presidential contest.

But I have to give the reporter who wrote it, Joe Sneve, a bit of a hard time, because he left out a pretty important part in his article that is quickly found:

Citizens for a Better South Dakota Chair Brian Gochal said the organization began running the Noem-cannabis advertisement this week to highlight “the hubris” that it requires for someone to stand up against something that enjoys more support than they do.

And…

Presidential election years have higher voter turnouts than election years when the governor’s office is up.

Gochal said Citizens for a Better South Dakota spent almost $1,400 on a contract to run the advertisement at 16 different billboards across Sioux Falls on a rotating basis over the next 30 days.

Read that here.

So, the person running this organization says they’re doing it because they want to take the Gov down a peg. But where is this Political Action Committee getting their money to take a shot at Governor Noem? They’re a political action committee, so they had to have gotten their money somewhere.

It gets a little curious, and a lot more obvious as to motive when we follow the money.

Citizens for a Better South Dakota disclosure by Pat Powers on Scribd

“Citizens for a Better South Dakota” list only 2 sources of income for their political action committee. The SD GPLDC PAC Fund and the BlueStem Initiative:

What’s the SD GPLDC PAC Fund?

SdgPl Cpac Fund by Pat Powers on Scribd

Plain and simple, it’s a Labor Union PAC. When their e-mail address starts with “Local620,” it’s not just a subtle hint.  That would be where the “Citizens for a Better South Dakota” got the lions’ share of their cash.

How about the rest that came form the Bluestem initiative? Well, that’s even less subtle:

This statewide PAC is ran by Democrat House Minority Leader Jamie Smith, and Democrat House member Ryan Cwach. In fact, the goal of the group on their statement of organization is to “Maintain and increase number of elected democrats in the SD House of Representatives.

So Cash goes out from State Democrats’ and a Labor Union’s PACs and into a third PAC which uses it to attack the Republican Governor.

I think we know what’s going on here.

South Dakota College Republicans raging against National CR organization after voting rights stripped from number of states

South Dakota’s College Republicans are howling after they along with a number of other states have been stripped of their right to vote in the upcoming College Republican National elections in the midst of an internal power struggle.

In fact, the discontent is enough where I’ve heard that a coalition of states led by Texas may be bringing suit.

I’m sure this isn’t the last we’re going to hear about this.

Governor Noem Appoints Stephanie Rissler and Julie Bartling to Game, Fish & Parks Commission

Governor Noem Appoints Stephanie Rissler and Julie Bartling to Game, Fish & Parks Commission

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, Governor Kristi Noem announced that she will appoint Stephanie Rissler and Julie Bartling to serve on the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks (GFP) Commission.

“South Dakota’s breathtaking parks and tremendous hunting and fishing opportunities are a big part of what makes our state so special,” said Governor Kristi Noem. “I look forward to working with Stephanie, Julie, and the rest of the Commission to find even more opportunities to highlight South Dakota’s natural beauty.”

Rissler worked in tv and radio from 1989 until last year, including 23 years at South Dakota Public Broadcasting. Since December 2020, she has served as the Communication Manager for the South Dakota Association of HealthCare Organizations. She graduated from Black Hills State University with a Bachelor of Science in Mass Communications in 1995.

Bartling currently serves as the Gregory County Auditor. She held that position from 1983 through 2000 and since 2019. She also served in the South Dakota Legislature from 2001 through 2010 and from 2013 through 2018, serving five terms in the House and three terms in the Senate. She and her husband, Bart, have owned Bartling Trucking since 1977, have a farm and ranch in Gregory County, and are the parents of four and grandparents of eight grandchildren.

Information on the GFP Commission can be found here. Photographs of Rissler and Bartling can be found here.

###

Still no word about Dakota Free Press leaving the state..

I notice we haven’t really heard anything about Cory Heidelberger, author of Dakota Free Press, leaving the state again several days after making note that his wife has accepted a new position in Lincoln, Nebraska.

Just in case he remains mum about the whole thing, and you need to remind yourself, I created a helpful tool:

If you click on the image, it will update you on roughly how many days we can expect until the state’s most liberal commentator is probably leaving on a permanent basis.

Congressman Dusty Johnson raises over $450k, tops $1.5 Million Cash on Hand in latest FEC Report

Whoever decides to challenge Congressman Dusty Johnson is definitely going to get the full Dusty when the campaign kicks off – because he’s adding to a total that’s now over $1.5 Million dollars in campaign cash.

Dusty Johnson July 2021 FEC Report by Pat Powers on Scribd

Dusty is reporting $453,727.16 in net contributions this quarter against only $50,188.37 in expenses, putting him at a strong $1,547,538.42 for the 2022 Congressional race to match his reported status as one of South Dakota’s most liked political figures.