Welcome SD Marsy’s Law to the dakotawarcollege.com Advertiser’s row.

The South Dakotans promoting Marsy’s Law are our newest advertiser here at the SDWC, and will be with us through the election.

SouthDKBlogGraphicTake a moment to click on their ad, and check out their website, and please do so for all of our advertisers such as United States Senator John Thune, Americans for Prosperity SD Chapter, Congresswoman Kristi Noem, the fine barristers at Redstone Law Firm, as well as my own Dakota Campaign Store, one of the State’s largest suppliers of campaign materials.

And if you might be interested, we do have other advertising spots available. Drop a note to the webmaster for more information!

Rounds Opening Statement at EPW Subcommittee Hearing on Small Businesses’ Perspectives of EPA Regulations

Rounds Logo 2016Rounds Opening Statement at EPW Subcommittee Hearing on Small Businesses’ Perspectives of EPA Regulations

Hearing Entitled, “American Small Businesses’ Perspectives on Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Actions”

WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Management and Regulatory Oversight, today delivered the following opening statement at the hearing, “American Small Businesses’ Perspectives on Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Actions.” The purpose of the hearing is to examine how regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) affect small businesses in the United States.

Some guys got together in South Dakota on July 4th, 1889…

So, while my daughter was getting inducted into the National Honor Society last night, I kept one eye on my phone.

I wasn’t intentionally being rude, but darn it, it happened to coincide with the on-line auction ending for an item I wanted very, very badly. And I quite pleased to say that I managed to get the souvenir for this little gathering in Sioux Falls where some guys got together on July 4th, 1889…:

con_con

This is a ribbon worn by one of the participant’s in South Dakota’s Constitutional Convention, which wrote our state’s founding document around 127 years ago.

You all might think it’s boring, but as a political history buff, I think it’s kind of cool.

Jay Williams solidifying the hippie vote.

First, Democrat US Senate Candidate Jay Williams was out demanding that all fossil fuels be banned.

And in his latest missive, he claims pot prohibition “is a bad idea,” and the war on drugs was actually Nixon going after “people of color and war protesters.”

jaywilliams_propot

Welcome to the 1960’s.  Or at least, welcome to a candidate with liberal views from them.

Thune’s Bipartisan Aviation Bill Would Keep Airline Passengers Safe

thuneheadernew Thune’s Bipartisan Aviation Bill Would Keep Airline Passengers Safe

“Airline passengers deserve more transparency, and the future of aviation needs a plan. And we have one in the U.S. Senate.”

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, today released a brief video outlining his vision for the future of aviation. Thune is the lead sponsor and bill manager of S. 2658, the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act of 2016, which is under consideration in the Senate this week. Enhancing aviation security has been a priority for Thune, and his amendment that would take important steps toward protecting the traveling public and tightening the vetting process for airport workers was recently added to S. 2658.

Michael Clark: My Run for The South Dakota House Update #2 The Candidate Survey

Soon after becoming a candidate I started to receive ‘Candidate surveys’ from various lobbying groups. How can I tell it is a survey?
survey
I am reminded of this little quote

“Tread lightly when completing candidate surveys/questionnaires. You have almost nothing to gain and instead provide ammunition for opponents or groups to use against you in your campaign.”
– Brian Gosch
South Dakota House Majority Leader

Here is a conversation I had with myself when I received my first survey:

So, trap?

Trap.

Are you going to fill it out?

Won’t take but a few minutes.

Yeah, but remember the part where it’s a trap?

Might be, we got a shot at seeing who’s turning these wheels. Let’s fill it out and see what shakes loose.

How do you know that they just don’t want to know where you stand on the issues? People just want to know who you are and what you’re about here. I’m referring to real people here.

Y’all read this survey, I take it?

Yeah.

Did they ask for money?

Nope.

Trap!

First question:

Will you oppose any increase in taxes or fees?
_____Yes _____No

Talk about a trap! Just who do you think would answer ‘No’?

As a general rule, I dislike rising taxes or fees and will avoid it, if possible. However there are some situations that a tax increase is just plain unavoidable or needs to be done.

I have to go back to Governor Rounds who wouldn’t just sign pledges or commit to do or not do something so broadly. His reasoning is sound. Unless someone has crystal ball or magic mirror and can tell us what situations we are going face in the future, it is bad idea to commit to something like this then have the need to increase taxes or fees.

Some taxes I opposed like the $1.00 increase on cigarettes and 25% more on tobacco products. Not because I approve of smoking, because the money was destined for the general fund, not anti-smoking campaigns or Medicaid. I also couldn’t support the current tax increase for teacher pay in its current form. Not that teachers don’t deserve more pay, however I still maintain at least some of the money can be found in the state budget.

I can support the increase for maintaining the highway. Maintenance costs have gone up and revenue just hasn’t been keeping pace.

Most of the questions is looking for a yes or no answer. Do you support this idea or that movement. As in most politics it isn’t that quite that simple. It isn’t just black and white, more like a 107 shades of grey.

I get it. These surveys are used to help build voter guides and side by side comparisons between candidates especially, those without a voting record. Many of the issues are a wee bit complex.  Sometimes the answer needs to be more than ‘Yes’ or ‘No’

If you really want to know where a candidate stand on an issue or issues You can contact many of them by E-mail, by phone or even put pen to paper and write them a letter.

Hickey/Hildebrand on the attack again, this time because Lutherans don’t want to join their team.

The crusaders of Because-I-say-so, Steve Hildebrand and Steve Hickey, are on the attack again in the Argus Leader this morning, after what I assume was a crabby e-mail to Jonathan Ellis trying to whip up a controversy among South Dakota ELCA Lutherans because the group had no interest in joining them.

But in South Dakota, where voters this year will decide on a ballot measure that caps interest rates on short-term loans at 36 percent, the ELCA is sitting on the sidelines. Efforts to recruit the church, which is one of the most influential religious organizations in the state, have failed.

Supporters of the cap say they know why: The lawyer who represents the South Dakota Synod of the ELCA in Pierre also represents the payday lending industry.

and..

Two of the sponsors of the 36 percent rate cap, Steve Hickey and Steve Hildebrand, personally lobbied Zellmer for his support on the ballot issue last year. Hickey described Zellmer as a “cold fish” when it came to the issue.

In an interview this month, Zellmer said he heard them out. But he said he has not received direction on the issue from the South Dakota Synod Assembly.

“I don’t work for Steve Hickey. I don’t work for Steve Hildebrand,” Zellmer said.

and..

“I would completely trust that Bishop Zellmer is above board on these kinds of questions,” Sorenson said.

Sorenson added that Lutherans are commanded to make the best construction of what others say or do and not to assume the worst.

“I think we tend to be too suspicious of these kinds of things,” he said.

Read it here.

This fight is mainly a difference of opinion on whether a legal consumer lending product should remain legal. Economists and scholars in favor of free enterprise believe that limiting choices on things like short term loans limits freedom.  The two Steves believe in less freedom, and limits on free enterprise and want to end the availability of those types of lending products.

Beating the drum of “It’s all a conspiracy, and they’re all in cahoots!”,  these opponents of the short term lending industry have regularly been on the attack against anyone who disagrees with them on the issue, and in some cases have been fairly vicious.  The short term lending opponents have attacked the industry and made claims of them being involved with the mafia, and now they’re attacking the integrity of the ELCA’s Lutheran Bishop because he isn’t signing on to their cause.

When I say “I can’t imagine why someone would take a pass on being involved with those guys'”  I’m doing so with a heavy dollop of sarcasm.  With their name calling and strong-arm tactics, at this point, it’s hard to imagine anyone credible wanting to be involved with them.

Especially when their social engineering moves us away from free enterprise, and towards more socialism.

US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: Greatness Resides in Toughness Together

thuneheadernew John_Thune,_official_portrait,_111th_CongressGreatness Resides in Toughness Together
By Sen. John Thune

It comes as no surprise to those who know me that I have an abiding interest in competitive athletics. With a dad who was a basketball star in the Big Ten, it was sort of expected that we would like sports. My mom, who was less than enthusiastic about this perpetual sports mindset, used to lament that all the Thune boys were born with a ball in their hands. To her credit, she saw to it that we balanced our interests by requiring that we all take piano lessons, which I did for six years. I also played tuba in the band and sang in the swing choir – opportunities afforded to kids growing up in small towns. But it was all secondary to sports.

Through the years, as I’ve transitioned from competitor to fan, I have found so many metaphors for life in sports, lessons learned from the heat of competition. That was especially true this year. South Dakota schools, at every level, saw great success across a wide range of sports, but because we have just concluded the basketball season, I thought it was worth reflecting on what was accomplished this year on the court.

Never before in my lifetime have we witnessed the unprecedented success that our college teams, men’s and women’s, experienced this past season. No fewer than 12 South Dakota basketball teams qualified for postseason tournament play. Several made deep runs in those tournaments, and two were crowned national champions, the Augustana University men and the USD women.

I had the good fortune to see many of those schools play this year, and I could not be prouder of our athletes, coaches, and fans. Basketball got played the way it was supposed to be played. Our athletes displayed the kind of work ethic that should make every South Dakotan proud. They played unselfishly and put the team’s success ahead of their own. Their behavior on and off the court was the stuff that restores faith to the most jaded among us that there are role models worthy of our children’s admiration.

As I watched the USD women put the final touches on their historic championship run, I thought of what it takes to achieve that level of success. Being able to sustain that standard of excellence through a nearly 40-game season requires something more than the ordinary. I don’t know if the USD women coined it or not, but the hashtag #GRITT became their creed. It’s short for “Greatness Resides In Toughness Together.” For these young women, it was more than just a slogan. They lived it. You could see it in their play. It defined their season. It inspired an entire state, and now they will forever have “national champions” attached to their resumes.

Which brings me to our present circumstances. One can’t help but observe the tone of our public discourse and feel that it is not worthy of a great nation. Maybe what we need is a little #GRITT. It is important to remember that there are no shortcuts to greatness. The challenges we face in the future will require a collective toughness, the kind of toughness that previous generations of South Dakotans knew all too well. The kind that leads to greatness. Politicians can promise greatness and offer free stuff, but true greatness won’t come from government. It’s found in the toughness of the American people, and we have the USD women to thank for reminding us of that.

###

US Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: The Health Care Crisis in Indian Country

Rounds Logo 2016 MikeRounds official SenateThe Health Care Crisis in Indian Country
By Senator Mike Rounds

 

Since taking office in January 2015, it has become clear to me that Indian Health Service (IHS), specifically in the Great Plains Area—which covers South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa—is plagued with systematic problems affecting Native Americans in South Dakota. Tribal members have been suffering and, in some cases, dying due to inadequate or improper health care provided by IHS. It is time for IHS to get its act together and follow through on its trust responsibility to deliver quality health care to Native Americans.

My office has begun working on an in-depth profile analysis of IHS. We’re working with the Congressional Research Service and analyzing data and reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Health and Human Services to find answers.  What we have found so far says a lot about why IHS is failing so miserably.

We need to understand the organization itself before we can begin to solve problems. We know though, that if we don’t solve the problems at IHS, we will continue to see more examples of hospitals failing to meet basic requirements to provide safe health care, therefore losing essential services like emergency care. The Rosebud hospital’s emergency department has been on diversion—which essentially means it is shut down—for four months, forcing patients to be diverted to facilities 50 or more miles away. The Winnebago and Pine Ridge hospitals have also been cited for serious safety deficiencies. We need to focus on why so many problems continue to occur at IHS, especially in the Great Plains Area, and why they aren’t getting fixed. I plan on finding answers to these questions and working with the tribes on solutions.

Earlier this year, I requested a Senate Indian Affairs Committee hearing to examine a number of reports of negligence at IHS hospitals in the Great Plains Area. We heard horrific stories of dirty or broken medical equipment, poor record-keeping, and in one inexcusable case, a woman gave birth to her baby on a bathroom floor with no nurses or doctors around to help her.

There is absolutely no excuse for hospitals not to reach basic benchmarks for providing proper health care. Tribal members have told my office that some IHS hospitals they visit are still working with outdated, inadequate and sometimes broken medical equipment. Through our research, we have found that IHS allocates less than 0.5 percent of their total $4.8 billion budget to equipment purchases.

The Great Plains Area IHS, which operates 35 of the total 153 IHS facilities, only receives $116 million for direct care, or 2 percent of the IHS total appropriation. We also learned that IHS has more than 15,000 employees, and only 750 are identified as doctors, yet more than 3,700 employees are dedicated to Medicaid billing. It’s hard not to come to the conclusion that the IHS system is more concerned about building and protecting a bureaucracy than taking care of people. IHS has no funding formula, no consistent qualitative reporting measurements, and too many of their “Area Directors” appear to be little more than temporary employees. Lastly, IHS spends less per capita than the Bureau of Prisons spends on each inmate’s health care.  Looking at statistics like these makes it clear that IHS will never be able to function properly unless it undergoes major changes. More taxpayer money won’t solve the dysfunction. Consider this: if the president proposed and Congress supported doubling IHS’s budget, based on IHS’s current template they’d have 1,500 doctors, 7,400 bureaucrats billing Medicaid, and they would have 20,000 administration employees and only 10,700 healthcare providers. That will solve nothing. Both systematic and financial changes need to occur.

The state of IHS and the inability to fix these decades-old problems has resulted in a federal government-initiated crisis in Indian Country. The Great Plains Area ranks second highest in infant mortality rates among all IHS regions. We have the highest diabetes death rates, highest tuberculosis death rates and the highest alcohol-related death rates. Great Plains Area tribal members have the lowest life expectancy rate at 68.1 years, while the U.S. average is almost ten years more at 77.7. These statistics aren’t from a foreign country. These are South Dakotans and our neighbors. Frankly, all of us should expect more.

If we’re going to find a real plan to fix the problems at IHS, we need to fully understand the current organization. We can’t rebuild or repair something until we find out what is and is not working. I will continue working with tribal leadership, IHS administrators, Health and Human Services and others to identify key areas of reform and identify potential solutions to provide better health care to our tribal members. The current situation within IHS is unacceptable.

###