Gov. Noem VETOES Tax Increase

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. – Today, Governor Kristi Noem VETOED House Bill 1109, which would raise occupation taxes on both South Dakotans and visitors to our state. You can find Governor Noem’s VETO letter here.

“The occupation tax is not just paid by out-of-state travelers. This legislation would raise taxes on South Dakotans. South Dakota residents are traveling every day for business, medical visits, youth activities, weddings – the list goes on. South Dakotans vacation in South Dakota, as well,” wrote Governor Noem in a letter to legislators.

This legislative session, Governor Noem has been advocating for the largest tax cut in South Dakota history by eliminating the sales tax on groceries.

“We should be working to cut taxes this legislative session, not increase them. I oppose the tax increases enabled by House Bill 1109 and ask that you sustain my veto,” concluded Governor Noem.

You can find photos of Governor Noem vetoing HB 1109 here.

###

State Senator Tom Pischke is finding today that he’s been shot down again, this time going to the Attorney General and demanding that he prosecute his colleagues for doing their job. The same question he asked the Hughes County States Attorney.

And the response is, “The Attorney General respects and is bound by Supreme Court decisions. Therefore, this Office has, and must, reach the same legal decision as the Hughes County State’s Attorney did in leaving these reported matters to the discretion of the Legislature.”

Did anyone think that it was going to be a different answer?

In other words, Tom got thumbs down from the AG.

Yesterday, this was the front page of the @argusleader.

Today, Argus didn’t show up for a @kristinoem press conference in their home city. And yes, Gov took questions from the media.#Priorities pic.twitter.com/GDM1fbEoxg

— Ian Fury (@IanTFury) March 1, 2023

You can go read the entire thing when it’s posted, but in the Hill City Prevailer tonight, a former Legislator is letting the public know what he thinks about Julie Frye Mueller, and a few others.

and…

As published in the HIll City Prevailer.

I don’t think Jon Ellis and Joe Sneve intended to get the Dakota Scout newspaper all caught up in the web of JFM sycophants, but I’ll leave it to them to defend themselves.

Johnson Questions CCP Involvement in Global Food Sector

 Washington, D.C. – Yesterday, U.S. Representative Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) participated in the first hearing held by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to address the CCP’s threat to America.

Johnson’s line of questioning focused on the CCP’s increase of ownership of American farmland and agriculture processing facilities, along with the growing influence the CCP has over farmland globally.

Click here or on the video above to watch Johnson’s full line of questioning

 

Johnson’s Line of Questioning:

Johnson: “I fear that too many Americans view the Chinese Communist Party as a threat over there, when in reality it is a threat here.

“That’s why I was so grateful to hear General McMaster say tonight, ‘It is a real mistake to give an adversary coercive power over your economy.’

“And I was so grateful to hear Mr. Paul say, ‘We need tighter controls over CCP investment in this country, particularly in critical sectors.’

“So, with that, Mr. Pottinger and others, I want to draw our attention to what is most assuredly a critical sector, and that is food. Food security is national security. We know that in recent years, the Chinese Communist Party has increased its holdings of farmland outside of China by one thousand percent. During that same time frame, they have acquired 1,300 agricultural processing facilities. This is a deliberate and focused attempt. 

“Mr. Pottinger to you, do we know to what extent those efforts by the CCP are motivated by their desire to gain the kind of coercive power that the General was talking about?

Mr. Pottinger: “One of the reasons that we should be extremely careful about permitting purchases of farmland in the United States by companies that are beholden to the Chinese Communist Party is that sometimes the farmland is an proximity to sensitive installations, nuclear facilities or other military bases. There may be more at play as well. It certainly bears close scrutiny.

“Why has there been such a significant increase in Chinese purchases and farmland? I think that with the Committee for Foreign Investment in The United States (CFIUS), there should be closer scrutiny on these purchases, but we’ve seen some purchases go through even recently that were relatively close proximity to military bases. I’m not sure why they chose not to scrutinize that particular deal. They’ve had a trend of not exercising its ability to actually block and instead they frequently try to mitigate, but the mitigation measures are usually hollow and don’t actually protect our national security 

Johnson: “So with regards to the domestic investment, there are many in Congress, myself, Mr. Newhouse and others that have legislation that would address that. Let’s focus on Chinese investments in food supply elsewhere. I think about the southern globe, Africa, South America, southeast Asia. To what extent should that investment concern Americans?

Pottinger: “I think the Communist Party’s actions to try to lock up major supplies of  commodities and goods probably including figurative, but also certainly rare earth material, cobalt, and things that go into everything from regular consumer products to military goods is part of a  grand strategy. It’s not just haphazard. It’s not just about making a buck.

Johnson: “That bears repeating—this is part of a grand strategy. It is something we want to be focused, thoughtful, and deliberate about as we work to strategically decouple from the Chinese Communist Party. There’s an opportunity there for us to draw our allies in the Indo-Pacific and elsewhere closer. That’s going to give us a great opportunity to protect freedom. It’s not just in food security that this investment has the potential to create coercive power. I have a letter here, Mr. Chairman from when many within the communications industry talking about the importance of the Rip and Replace Regime regarding Huawei and other Chinese in telecommunications infrastructure. I would ask for unanimous consent to enter it into the record.

Pottinger: “Thanks to enterprising reporting a few years ago by the Wall Street Journal, we know that Huawei was working with a couple of African governments to surveil political opponents in those countries and in some cases those political opponents and activists were arrested and in jailed. So, Beijing is exporting all of the tools that you would need to run a totalitarian system.

###

Rounds Questions Witnesses on the Dangers of Foreign Adversaries Owning American Farmland and Agricultural Businesses 

 

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) questioned witnesses about the dangers of foreign adversaries owning American farmland and agricultural businesses during a Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing titled, “Advancing National Security and Foreign Policy Through Sanctions, Export Controls, and Other Economic Tools.”

Rounds teamed up with Senator Jon Tester (D-Mont.) during the hearing to emphasize the need for their bipartisan legislation, the Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security (PASS) Act of 2023, to combat the threat this ownership would pose to the national security of the United States. This bill would blacklist China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, or their agents, from investing in, purchasing or otherwise acquiring farmland or agricultural businesses. More information on Rounds’ PASS Act can be found HERE.

Click HERE to view the remarks from Rounds and Tester.

###

South Dakota Right to Life is under the glare of the spotlight in an article posted at the Dakota Scout today, as the group is being criticized over their opposition to place an exception into state law to “preserve the life of the mother” have caused measures to fail in both Houses.

Heavy opposition from South Dakota Right to Life has stalled efforts by a group of female Republican legislators to clarify what’s know as a “life of the mother” exception to South Dakota’s abortion ban.

With a week left to go in the state’s 98th Legislative session, there’s been just one contentious abortion-related bill filed — and it never saw debate. Rep. Taylor Rehfeldt in early February shelved a bill she crafted to more clearly permit abortions when a pregnancy puts a mother in danger of death. And another run at similar legislation this week by Sen. Erin Tobin never came to fruition.

and..

“They are the hold up,” Tobin told The Dakota Scout Wednesday morning. “We’ve worked eight months to try and get them on board, and we’re being delayed. It’s really difficult to understand.”

Read the entire story here. (subscription required)

In previous years, the prevailing line of thinking for most South Dakotans was to prohibit abortion, but to allow exceptions for rape, incest, and the life (or health) of the mother.  Refusing to address the exceptions places SDRTL, which has always been the most mainstream of anti-abortion groups, in danger of being considered more draconian and extreme at a time when a measure to restore abortion rights is being circulated for the ballot.

With an organizational board that boasts no fewer than 5 current/former legislators as part of the group, you would think that they’d look at the big picture, as opposed to adopting a more hard-line stance.

We’ll see how that works out in the long run.

South Dakota Right to Life needs to get on board, or we will become another Kansas, and lose our Pro-life battle in a landslide vote by the people. https://t.co/56gL1CKDTY

— Erin Tobin (@ErinTobin21) March 1, 2023

Election Integrity Bill Passes House State Affairs Committee

PIERRE, S.D. – An election integrity bill, supported by South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley, passed another legislative hurdle Wednesday.

Senate Bill 207 would strengthen the ban on the inappropriate use of taxpayer dollars to influence the outcome of an election. The bill was approved 8-4 by the House State Affairs Committee.

“This bill protects taxpayer dollars from being used to inappropriately influence elections,” said Attorney General Jackley.

While the measure protects the use of public funds, Attorney General said the bill does not restrict elected officials from speaking in their elected capacity nor any government employee from their involvement in such an issue while in their personal capacity. Governmental bodies still would have the opportunity to present factual information to the public for the purpose of educating voters on a ballot question

Sen. David Wheeler of Huron introduced the bill, which now goes to the full House.

“We appreciate Senator Wheeler’s work to protect taxpayer dollars, and his willingness to work with the Attorney General’s Office,” said Attorney General Jackley.

-30-

Just caught this story about this weekend’s crackerbarrels, and at least one person is claiming that things might have gotten heated enough that hands were thrown.

Remember the flyers that were being passed out by the “shunned by Pine Ridge evangelist” Matthew Monfore that I had posted earlier this week?  These one-sided documents were being distributed at the D30 Crackerbarrels.

Apparently they caused at least one legislative spouse to get a little hot under the collar. And no, not the one who smiles and nods when his wife gives lactation advice.

In his program yesterday, KOTA AM Radio host Matt Smith claims that after one of this weekends’ crackerbarrels, Bobby Ladner, husband of State Representative Trish Ladner, using his open hand slapped the glasses off of Matthew Monfore’s face until as Smith claims, he stepped in between the two.  In the episode dated February 28, if you have time, you can start listening at about 01:13:00. But the part where he claims there was an alleged slap is about 01:19:00 – Click here to listen.

Not finding anything to immediately corroborate it, but I’m sure there will more to come.

Stay tuned.

Thune: Biden’s Radical Nominees Fly in the Face of Bipartisanship   

“If the president truly wants to usher in an era of bipartisanship in this period of divided government, he could start by rethinking some of the highly partisan renominations he’s made in this Congress, and consider nominating individuals who are able to gain at least some bipartisan support.”

Click here or on the picture above to watch the video.

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today spoke on the Senate floor about President Biden’s highly partisan nominees. Thune stated that the president has renominated at least 15 individuals who were unable to get any bipartisan support in the last Congress. Thune noted that if the president truly wants to usher in an era of bipartisanship in this period of divided government, he should consider nominating individuals who are able to gain at least some bipartisan support.