SDDP Exec Director Pam Cole leaving Dem Party Job. SDGOP very sorry to see her go.

Pam (Merchant) Cole is apparently leaving her position as Executive Director at the South Dakota Democrat Party at the end of February, according to the Rapid City Journal:

“Pam’s efforts and passion for the party got us through a challenging time and put us on the right path going forward. I’m grateful for her dedication and wish her well in her future pursuits,” said Senate Minority Leader Troy Heinert.

Read that all here.

I know I can speak for many members of the South Dakota Republican Party that after trimming their legislative numbers to 3 Democrat State Senators and 8 Democrat State Representatives, we’re very sorry to see her go.

She was a “valuable” contributor to the success of the SDGOP’s efforts.

Plaintiff’s Statement on Amendment A being found unconstitutional

From Facebook:

“Pennington County, SD – Pennington County Sheriff Kevin Thom and South Dakota Highway Patrol Superintendent Col. Rick Miller are pleased by the decision of Circuit Judge Christina Klinger on the legal challenge to Amendment A. Today the Hughes County judge agreed with Sheriff Thom, Col. Miller, and South Dakota citizens who overwhelmingly voted to pass Amendment Z in 2018 to protect our state constitution.

“The judge’s ruling today solidifies the protections that were sought in the previous passing of Amendment Z.” Sheriff Thom continues, “It is an honor to defend our state constitution, and I appreciate the judge ruling in our favor today.”
Additionally, the judge ruled that the process to modify the constitution was improper as it was a revision to the constitution rather than an amendment.

“I am pleased with the court’s decision today, though I realize that the Supreme Court will likely have the opportunity to address our constitutional concerns on their merits,” says Col. Miller.

The plaintiffs’ arguments focus on the unconstitutional drafting and proposal of this issue as a constitutional amendment. First, they cite this clause in Article XXIII Sec. 1. of the South Dakota Constitution: “A proposed amendment may amend one or more articles and related subject matter in other articles as necessary to accomplish the objectives of the amendment; however, no proposed amendment may embrace more than one subject.”

Second, the pleadings emphasize that Amendment A is a Constitutional Revision rather than a Constitutional Amendment, and thus was passed via an unconstitutional process.

Given that this matter faces additional litigation given the likelihood of an appeal to the South Dakota Supreme Court, neither Sheriff Thom nor Col. Miller will be making further comment.”

More on Amendment A being shot down…

Joe Sneve at the Argus Leader has some of the same information I’d gotten wind of earlier:

Circuit Court Judge Christina Klinger in a decision issued Monday ruled that Constitutional Amendment A violates the state Constitution on two grounds: It violates single subject rule, meaning it encompassed more than one topic; and it conflicts with language in the Constitution that provides for its modification.

Read Joe Sneve’s story here.

BREAKING… Early reports that Constitutional Amendment A has been declared unconstitutional

I am hearing early reports from a good source that Amendment A legalizing recreational marijuana has been declared unconstitutional, and is being considered a Constitutional revision and not an amendment by the circuit court.

I’m hearing the election contest was thrown out as not a proper challenge.. and Amendment A violates single subject rule.

More to come, as the decision is just being digested now by all parties concerned.

This will be big news for the next few days.

Gov. Noem to Deliver Special Address to South Dakota Legislature 

ADVISORY: Gov. Noem to Deliver Special Address to South Dakota Legislature 

Governor Kristi Noem will deliver a special address to the South Dakota legislature on Tuesday, February 9, 2021, at 2 pm CT/1 pm MT. The speech will take place in the chamber of the South Dakota House of Representatives. Governor Noem’s speech will focus on revised revenue projections.

WHAT: Gov. Noem to deliver Special Address

WHEN: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 – 2:00 pm CT/1:00 pm MT

WHERE: South Dakota State Capitol – House of Representatives

STREAM LINKS: Facebook.com/govnoem OR SD.Net

###

Former Republican State Senator John Lake appointed to State Board of Elections

I haven’t seen a release on it, but the Secretary of State’s website today reflects a change in the composition of the State Board of Elections.

For the Senate Majority Leader’s appointee, out is Rick Knobe, who seemed to spend more time on whatever goofy thing he was supporting at the moment, and in is John Lake, a former Republican State Representative/State Senator who was a genuine and thoughtful legislator.

Good pick!

Governor Noem Signs Twenty-Six Bills into Law

Governor Noem Signs Twenty-Six Bills into Law

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, Governor Kristi Noem signed twenty-six bills into law:

  • SB 1 codifies legislation enacted in 2020.
  • SB 2 modifies the duties of the Code Commission.
  • SB 7 permits a government agency to qualify as a victim for purposes of restitution in criminal cases.
  • SB 8 revises various provisions related to banks and trusts.
  • SB 9 revises various provisions related to bank trust departments and trust companies.
  • SB 11 revises provisions regarding highways and bridges.
  • SB 12 updates a reference to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names standards manual.
  • SB 13 revises a statutory cross reference in the written waiver of right to a parole hearing or appearance.
  • SB 14 limits time children in need of supervision are held in detention under certain circumstances.
  • SB 15 revises the voting requirements necessary for the board to grant or deny parole or recommend clemency.
  • SB 16 revises the requirements of setting discretionary parole dates by the board.
  • SB 19 corrects errors in statutory cross-references in certain provisions regarding healthcare.
  • SB 21 revises contracting procedure options for certain highway construction contracts.
  • SB 23 corrects a technical error concerning a cross-reference relating to certain reporting requirements for the building South Dakota programs.
  • SB 25 removes an incorrect cross-reference in provisions regarding elections.
  • SB 26 modifies the type of candidates that may use a joint petition.
  • SB 37 updates certain citations to federal regulations regarding pipeline safety inspections.
  • SB 38 corrects technical errors in and makes stylistic revisions to certain provisions regarding public utilities.
  • SB 67 corrects a cross reference relating to sheriff’s compensation.
  • SB 69 corrects certain provisions with incorrect cross references regarding county road district boundaries.
  • HB 1004 repeals the registration requirement for medical assistants.
  • HB 1005 repeals the emergency medical technician-student status license requirement.
  • HB 1006 revises certain provisions regarding the practice of chiropractic.
  • HB 1012 updates references to certain federal motor carrier regulations.
  • HB 1036 corrects technical errors in certain code cross-references regarding the Department of Game, Fish and Parks.
  • HB 1060 directs certain persons to notify funeral directors of communicable diseases or conditions.

Governor Noem has signed twenty-eight bills into law this legislative session.

###

NSU drops “Gypsy Days,” due to political correctness. And they’re coming for Hobo Day next.

It was announced today that Northern State University’s homecoming moniker of over 100 years is being dropped due to a spate of political correctness, where there are some who find the term “Gypsy Days” offensive, according to media reports:

Justin Fraase, vice president for enrollment, communications and marketing, said that since his arrival on campus four years ago, and even before, outside groups have made comments on social media and sent letters and emails about discontinuing the use of Gypsy Days.

and…

While the decision to shift to “homecoming” was made internally, Downs said there was a push from outside groups. Until hearing from them, Downs said, he hadn’t thought of Gypsy Days as offensive.

and..

Selecting a new theme, Fraase said, should be a process that involves the community, alumni, faculty and staff with the idea that it would be inclusive.

Read it all here.

Since the Snow Queen festival is held annually in Aberdeen where NSU is based, they could consider renaming the homecoming as NSU “Snowflake” Days.

Just a thought.  I’ve also heard Hawaiian Day is popular on some campuses.

Oh, and Jackrabbits – we might make light of the controversy, but don’t think the forces of political correctness aren’t eventually coming for South Dakota’s largest institute of higher education.

Earlier this month, the South Carolina Republican filed an amendment to an appropriations package that would prohibit a certain type of federal funding “to any school to celebrate Hobo Day,” which raises an obvious question: Is there a scourge of government-funded hobo bacchanalias?

Not exactly. In 2018, Norman introduced a bill identifying a lone culprit, South Dakota State University. “Not only is this celebration derogatory and negatively stereotypical, but it’s absolutely wasteful — plain and simple,” he said in a release announcing the bill, which attracted no co-sponsors.

Read it here.

*sigh*

I don’t think that’s how it works. Rep. Mulally learns about Value Added Agriculture.

From the appropriations committee on January 25th, Representative Mulally learns from the Governor’s Office of Economic Development that Value Added Agriculture is not just giving farmers “a buck” if they have corn valued at “a buck:”

.. it might be a long session.