If you recall the message from “Conservative” Hillary Clinton Donor Liz May, people who changed over to be Republicans are a serious problem in South Dakota elections.
However, this morning, Conservative State Representative Kevin Jensen had a different message:
While Conservative Hillary Clinton donor Liz May hates party switchers, Kevin Jensen says bring them on and switch now, because “you can always switch back.”
Kind of getting a mixed message here.
Huh.
But he is correct! Change the law and this nonsense will cease…unless the real Democrats don’t believe they’ll be elected under their temporary party affiliation.
Switching should be banned. Banned, I say.
The Libertarians do it all the time. Can’t get elected or are too chicken to run on the platform they truly believe, so they call themselves republicans. And then call others rinos.
Carpetbaggers (as presented in this usage) is one word, not two, Liz.
I pride myself as a Anti-Federakist type statesman. Someobe who aligns myself sitg the likes of Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, George Mason.
I do not get caught up in al thus political drama of who is left or who is right or who is liberal or conservative. They are all in both parties.
I support other Anti-Federalists. And no that does not mean we are against a centralgovernment, it means we support strong state governments with a very weak, but constitutional central government bound to the states.
I never have ever supported anyone from either party that supports tyranny, over taxation, nor those who violate my natural right to life, liberty, property, pursuit to happiness.
All these personal b.s between candidates and the two parties Re dogma, and make both parties look terrible. But to be honest both parties are left wing faction type platforms.
The democrats are who we know they are – socialists, fascists, control freaks, social welfare over taxation people. While the Republicans are well, a mix of socialists, fascists, social welfare supporters to your classical limited govt, less taxation, to creating policies that strip you of your rights. Evidence in this is just how far left this state as moved since 1933, it’s it as conservative as it prides itself to be. In fact, it’s progressive by design as it relies on federal funds to manage state and local properties and programs to it fights for farm and corporate subsidies as much ad the democrats fight for individual subsidies such as food stamps, housing, Healthcare, and disability. Both parties tend to support the illegal confiscation of property due to one parent acting as a lessor parent assessing a tax, child support in order to profit from one parent while providing further benefits to the custody parent. So this state is very progressive in nature.
We need legislators who bind themselves s to the constitutions, that hols the federal govt accountable to article 1, that enforce the ele Rion laws, are willing to audit ans fight fraud in our elections to repealing amendments 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 restoring stare rights.
I want to cut the size of rge federal govt by more than half, limit its spending to $1 billion, while getting rid of social security and Medicare NY first privatizing them to ending them placing people in private IRAS or possibly allowing state citizens to invest in tge State Public Employee Retirement System (SDERS) While allowing our citizens to continue contribute to the South Dakota Health Insurance Pool for public employees. As means to opening those public trusts to the citizens as well, that would keep income inside S.D free from the Federal Govt.
I want rhe legislature to enlarge or expand tge State Militia separating itself from the Federal armies, thus protect our borders, maybe allowing S.D CITIZENS to invest or donate to the S.D Militia Funs providing the state more capital for military.
I want the state to take less federal grants, loans, subsidies, monetary funds, etc.
I like to see property tax relief on all S.D CITIZENS who jacd paid property tax on their land for 30 years, thus restoring their right right to claim their and tax free, thus giving back to the citizen Allodial Title.
I want the federal govt defended, closing down all 17 federal agencies ans all but 3 federal departments (state, Treasury, war), while closing the federal reserve, estaishung State Banks to work together with the U.S Treasury to manage the nation’s economy.
The Federal income tax should ve repealed but State citizens can avoid it by in eating inside the state in the trusts I spoke of.
True Anti-Federalism tests in the people of the republic who have the ultimate authority over the federal govt – the state citizens and their legiators.
I like to see the national congress by means of rhe U.S HOUSE expanded to 1 member to every 100,000 American Cirizens which would give states like S.D 9 FEDERAL districts helping both rhe republican ans Demcorat voting areas of rge state to fair representation, and I want the legislature to appoint the two Senatoes every 2 years.
While restoring the full effect of the electoral college getting rid of the WINNSR TAKE ALL of delegates allowing the winner of each federal district the 1 delegate for president per district.
The person with the most becomes president, the runner up becomes vice president, and if no one gets 50% plus 1, the legiators then choose.
Those are the candidates I support. Those who think like me….
So what district do you reside in and when will you be running for office????
I think it’s time for you to look up the definition of Federalism.