The Brookings Register ‘localized’ the SD News Watch story as they took it to print, and posted it on their website, noticing the local Rick Weible group as it proclaims ‘Save Brookings’ head peddles election denial.
‘Save Brookings’ would be the book burning group that Rick set up to try to foster banning literature in the home of the state’s largest university.. a community which is about 20 or so miles to the west of his own home of Elkton.
It’s worth taking a look .. here is what happened in another state yesterday.
https://twitter.com/NorthamptonExec/status/1721925132099203397/photo/1
Maybe Weible should move to PA and peddle his bullshit there then.
was that with the main paper ballot counting machinery, or at touchscreen terminals?
re: northampton pa, officials caught the problem during voting at the few affected stations, informed voters of how to navigate the error, and took measures to amend the count to correct the error. sounds like the system worked.
Monae what were you thinking?
Common sense Republicans, who want to win elections, have to reject all this election denial nonsense. Best to do it now, loudly and consistently. As the Trump trials play out, and his lifetime of financial fraud and dishonesty play out in court, the Party should reject the candidate and his deceit. We have plenty of candidates who cab beat Joe Biden.
After last nights election results it should be even more evident that democrats are extremely energized and motivated to go out and vote. And it’s even more proof that hardline anti-abortion stances will lose us elections.
As long as men are required to pay child support, women are going to be bullied into having abortions, as too many men would rather kill children than support them.
It is a terrible conundrum. There was a time when a man could leave the state if he didn’t want to pay, but now he has to leave the country, and it’s easier to bully a woman into having an abortion than to leave the country.
Abortion proponents will say that children are better off dead than poor, and ask “who is going to support all these kids?” When the answer comes back “the men who fathered them,” they protest “that’s not fair!”
It would be interesting to see what would happen to out-of-wedlock pregnancy and abortion rates if a state eliminated court-ordered child support from the equation. How would women alter their behavior if they knew that if they get pregnant, they are on their own, and men knew that if they get a woman pregnant, it’s not their problem? That was the way the world worked before government got involved.
At a member of the bad dad caucus! So your alternative to say free contraception (which is proven to lower abortions), or improved prenatal care, better support for childcare, or any other potentially actual pro-life stance is to blame women and cast society back into a Dickensonian hell? Jesus no wonder why in every state that lets voters choose thus far they reject hardline abortion bans.
It is all autocratic stances, banning books, banning music, banning dancing, it is a thing of the past. The younger generation is going to activate more than they did in the past, freedom is preferred more than “party stance”. We’ve seen this even in South Dakota where you can vote for Trump, and also vote to legalize Marijuana. The party leaders need to understand this and quit with the preaching, which just draws interest to those books or way of life.
anon 7:37 – the 2020 election which trump really and truly lost badly, was a clear sign that democrats will rise up en masse against anything republican that rouses their anger. very clear sign. i’m sure trump hates the supreme court for making his re-election 20 times harder than it already was. he just won’t say it out loud, to break his pied-piper magic spell lol.
if i lived in that district, i’d vote dem if he were on my november ballot. weirdo.