US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: Our National Security Depends on Restoring American Energy Independence

Our National Security Depends on Restoring American Energy Independence
By Sen. John Thune
March 4, 2022

Over the last few weeks, the world has watched in horror as Russia has invaded Ukraine, and the videos and pictures we see on social media and the news are heartbreaking. The people of Ukraine continue to be in my thoughts and prayers, and although this is Ukraine’s fight, the implications of Vladimir Putin’s unprovoked aggressions against Russia’s neighbor are reverberating around the world. I believe that the United States and other free nations must match the resolve of the Ukrainian people and respond with swift and severe consequences for Putin and his cronies.

The lifeblood of Russia’s economy is their energy sector, and right now, the United States imports around 700,000 barrels of crude oil and other petroleum products per day from them. Under the Biden administration, U.S. imports of Russian energy have surged, and we can tragically see how Russia is spending its export profits in real time.

The conflict in Ukraine is a timely reminder that energy independence is not only a component of economic security, but it is also critically important to national security. In the United States, we cannot waste another second in terms of getting our energy producers off the bench and into the game. American energy independence, which we had during the last administration, and for the first time in my lifetime, means we don’t have to rely on foreign regimes for energy supplies.

Unfortunately, since taking office, President Biden has pursued a radical agenda that is hostile to conventional energy production. He set the tone on his first day in office when he canceled the Keystone XL pipeline – an environmentally responsible pipeline project that was already underway. The project was being paired with $1.7 billion in private investment in renewable energy to fully offset its operating emissions. Also, the president almost immediately froze new oil and gas leases on federal lands – sending a clear signal to oil and gas producers that his administration would be reluctant to work with them to increase American energy production.

President Biden seems to think that he can hurry along the clean energy future he dreams of by discouraging oil and natural gas production here at home, but frankly, clean energy sources are simply not at the point where they can solely power American homes and our economy. As we are seeing now, the only effect of curbing conventional energy production is to either force Americans to pay more for their energy or rely more on foreign sources, like Russia, for oil and natural gas. The more we rely on energy from abroad, the more vulnerable Americans are to energy price spikes and global shortages. Relying on foreign sources of energy also often means doing business with tyrannical governments and volatile areas of the world.

The only acceptable American energy policy is an all-of-the-above energy policy that invests in both clean energy technologies and conventional energy sources. That’s the only way to keep energy prices down and ensure that Americans’ energy needs are met – no matter what is going on in oil-producing countries around the globe. If the president really wants to lower energy prices for our families, as he indicated in his State of the Union address, he could reverse his rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would be a much-welcome recognition that liquid fuels will be part of meeting our domestic energy needs well into the future. He can also unlock our abundant energy reserves here in the United States by allowing responsible development on federal lands.

I am calling on President Biden to get serious about leveraging American agriculture as an energy solution, specifically restoring integrity to the Renewable Fuel Standard. This means not only setting robust blending targets and rejecting unnecessary and counterproductive small refinery exemptions, but also approving advanced fuels from corn kernel fiber and restoring the year-round sale of E15. These measures, and others like them, combined with clean-energy investment, would help lower energy prices now and in the future – and help put our nation on a path to long-term, full energy independence. It’s the best decision President Biden could make for American families struggling with high energy prices, and it’s the best decision he could make for the long-term security of our country.

I hope that the president will rethink his hostility to conventional energy production and spend the next year of his administration embracing the kind of all-of-the-above energy strategy our nation needs.

12 thoughts on “US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: Our National Security Depends on Restoring American Energy Independence”

  1. I sure wish Mr. Thune would give up this red herring about Russian oil. Yeah, more is imported from Russia than some years ago, but it’s 3.5% of imported oil. More than 2/3 of our imported oil is from Canada and Mexico. Russian imports only increased because we get less from
    places like Syria and Venezuela.

    I guess the Senator doesn’t really have much else to run on.

    1. Yeah, South Dakotans are finally waking up to the fact that Thune is just a lazy, do-nothing show horse, and I think he’s vulnerable this cycle…

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    2. So you think it’s just fine that the USA will pay Russia over $20M just today for the oil imported just today?

      1. The former guy had no problem with increasing oil imports from Russia, and here we are.

        1. Russia oil imports doubled under the administration of mumbling-stumbling Joe……so nice try CAH minion.

  2. How much is TransCanada spending on this PR campaign right now? They have almost every republican legislator making this statement, going on two weeks now.

    Let’s be real, the Keystone XL pipeline was using the patriot act to seize our land and force this on us with no consideration for the risk we take. Furthermore, this was a foreign company doing it by paying off just a few people in government. It is like saying Russia is good, just because they loan Trump money…give me a break, that doesn’t benefit me. We don’t import tar sands crude oil from Russia, the crude was scheduled to be exported only because Trump lifted the 2015 ban. Biden could approve the XL permit, but add the export ban back in, and this would still be unfeasible financially. We have 500+ other pipelines, this one pipeline did not create problems for anyone other than those that would benefit by the TransCanada profits.

  3. At $100 a barrel, 700,000 barrels a day is $70M per day to finance the war on Ukraine.
    Add the Keystone XL to the federal lands, the off-shore areas and ANWR. All discontinued in the past 14 months. Plus raising the price and increasing reg’s on remaining fed lands. And stalling several LNG facilities. That has been the Biden accomplishments. In total, you are talking about a bankrupt energy policy for the nation.

    1. Why is it only the federal lands that are considered for oil and gas extraction? The rest of the country is open, why is there only focus on this sector as the cause of oil supply issues?

      If you do a one time extraction, cut the tops off the mountains for coal, pollute the rivers from oil spills, then what? Will what will be the next issue, we will have gotten the oil for that period of time, but we’ve ruined an asset we owned for all future generations. We will be back where we started.

    2. Why are Repubs so hell-bent on drilling for oil in the most vulnerable of places, and what is the infatuation with this pipeline that was designed to get oil from Canada across our land just so it could be shipped to China?

      1. the question of why oil is in the most vulnerable of places is right up there with why don’t the deer use their designated crossing paths when they want to get to the other side of the road.

Comments are closed.