Health Secretary Kim Malsam-Rysdon to Join Private Sector

Health Secretary Kim Malsam-Rysdon to Join Private Sector

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, South Dakota Secretary of Health Kim Malsam-Rysdon announced that she will be departing from the Noem Administration to join the private sector. Her last day as Secretary will be January 7, 2022.

“Kim has been a steady hand as our Secretary of Health,” said Governor Kristi Noem. “I have appreciated her help and partnership during unprecedented times. We will miss having her on the team, and we wish her all the best.”

Secretary Malsam-Rysdon has been the Secretary of the Department of Health (DOH) since 2015. She previously served as senior advisor to Governor Daugaard, Secretary of the Department of Social Services, Deputy Secretary of Social Services, and Director of the Divisions of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities in the Department of Human Services. Prior to working for the state of South Dakota, Kim worked to help people with disabilities live and work in their communities. 

“I am thankful for the opportunity to lead the Department of Health the last seven years, and for Governor Noem’s leadership, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Secretary Kim Malsam-Rysdon. “The employees of the Department of Health are some of the best public servants in the state, and I am grateful for their hard work on behalf of people in South Dakota.”

Joan Adam, current Division Director for Administration at DOH, will serve as the Interim Secretary of Health. Joan has worked for the Department for a combined twenty years. She has served as Division Director for Administration since 2010, where she oversees the SD Public Health Laboratory; Correctional Healthcare Services; the Offices of Vital Records and Health Statistics, and Health Information Technology.

Joan and Karl, her husband of 32 years, live in Pierre, SD, where they have raised their five children.  Their family also includes a son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and one grandson. You can find a picture of Joan here.

###

Little or no movement forward by Special Investigative Committee on Impeachment, House Speaker blames frivolous lawsuits.

Dakota News Now has a story on the Special Investigative Committee on Impeachment which was formed by the State House of Representatives to review whether there was any basis to impeach Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg as a result of a traffic accident where Joseph Boever was killed in September of 2020.

And apparently in doing things such as seeking open government and disclosure, the media is being blamed by the Speaker of the House for the committee’s lack of forward momentum:

It has been a month since the South Dakota State House convened to create a committee to consider the impeachment of Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg.

and..

Speaker of the House Spencer Gosch (R-Glenham), who heads the committee, says that part of the reason for the delay is because of a number of lawsuits, or threats of lawsuits, that he and the Legislative Research Council (LRC) have faced.

“In the process of finding special counsel we have run into a few hiccups,” Gosch said. “Whether that be frivolous lawsuits from certain media entities, that takes up a ton of our time, or just threats thereof. Ultimately, we have run into other hiccups too. We are still on the right path and will have more updates as they come.”

Read the entire story here.

They’d have had that all figured out if it wasn’t for those meddling kids in the media?

I’m sure they would.

Governor Kristi Noem’s Weekly Column: Budgeting for the future

Budgeting for the future
By Governor Kristi Noem
December 10, 2021

This week, I outlined my budget recommendations for how we will run our state in the next fiscal year. The past year has brought historic challenges. South Dakota has taken those challenges in stride and has come out stronger.

Our state has the strongest economy in America. I want to make sure that we do not take that for granted, and that we also work to keep that momentum building. We are going to invest in our people and prepare for the future.

South Dakota is ranked in the Top 5 for fiscal stability. That is because for 133 years straight, we have passed balanced budgets and we hedge against potential downturns in the economy. This year, our state has seen tremendous growth in our revenue. That is why I am recommending a historic 14% — about $300 million — for strategic reserves in case the negative indicators in the economy start to make their way into our state.

These include historic investments in workforce housing, to spur new development of single- and multi-family homes. This includes $150 million from the state and $50 million in federal funds. A partnership with local cities and developers will triple the total investment to $600 million for new housing.

Through a partnership with local, state, and federal dollars, we can put $1.5 billion in combined funding to address water projects. These would replace aging infrastructure and help develop new systems for wastewater and sewers.

For those who are already working here, our Department of Social Services will be using $100 million in federal dollars to support existing daycares with one-time costs. These dollars can help expand availability at daycares, and also train more people to work at daycares.

And for those who are looking to switch careers or are getting ready to enter the workforce, I am recommending more than $47 million to expand skilled workforce training capacity at our colleges and universities. These include strengthening programs focused on healthcare, cybersecurity, manufacturing, and farming , and ranching. These programs have the potential to make our schools a top draw for students around the world. They also will attract some of the most competitive companies in a variety of industries.

Of course, we also need to keep our people healthy and strong. That is why I am recommending several key investments in healthcare. In addition to expanding workforce training so we have more qualified nurses, I am recommending we invest in marketing and recruiting for the industries most affected by the pandemic. I am supporting funding to create regional Behavioral Health Centers to help individuals struggling with mental health or substance abuse issues.

To improve access to care in our rural communities, I am recommending a combination of state and federal dollars to improve EMS services. These include funding for new technology to expand telehealth, upgrading life-saving equipment, and regionalizing services to improve response times.

I am recommending that the Department of Tourism use federal dollars to expand our successful marketing of both local and state attractions. South Dakota saw record tourism numbers this past year. We want to help these visitors explore more of our state by working with local cities and Native American tribes on marketing efforts to increase exposure.

I am also continuing my support of law enforcement by recommending several investments to our courts and to the Department of Corrections (DOC). These include targeted pay raises for the DOC to be competitive with other law enforcement agencies.

This week, I revealed that our DOC facility needs currently sit at about $600 million. We will not spend all of that today, but I am recommending the legislature save money for these needs in the future. I am recommending $28 million to build a Community Work Center for Women in Rapid City.

Last, but not least, I am recommending a historic 6% increase in funding for our state employees, educators, and healthcare providers. This increase is the largest in state history, and it is necessary because of dramatic inflation and to keep our salaries competitive.

Of course, this is not the complete budget recommendation. These are some of the highlights of solutions to priority issues facing South Dakota. To view my full budget proposal for the Fiscal Year 2023, go to https://bfm.sd.gov/budget.

###

Sen. Julie Frye-Mueller still spreading crackpot theories on school handbooks

Republican women had a pre-legislative forum recently, and it sounds like State Senator Julie Frye-Mueller took the opportunity to continue to spread her crackpot theories on school handbooks:

“This is where the schools can play doctor with your children in their non-emergency invasive physical exams,” says Rep. Frye-Mueller, eluding to some fine print in school handbooks that she says she’d be happy to show someone if they asked. “It’s in federal law, so it’s in every school handbook. What an invasive physical exam is, is exposure of private body parts, including incision insertion and injection into the body. Now, I could send my child to school and they could get a vaccine. Incision,” she says counting on her fingers, “insertion, injection.”

Read it all here.

(I’m glad for the crowd’s sake she only had to count to three, or they might have been waiting a while.)

If you recall, Frye-Mueller hadn’t been shy about claiming school handbooks would give permission for schools to ‘transgender’ children.

And it sounds as if she’s planning to bring this complete nuttery to the legislature in Pierre next month.

Thune: Democrats Move to Double the Size of the IRS, Jeopardize Taxpayers’ Privacy

Thune: Democrats Move to Double the Size of the IRS, Jeopardize Taxpayers’ Privacy

“Democrats’ reason for this IRS expansion is to raise revenue to help pay for their tax-and-spending spree.”

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today discussed the Democrats’ desire to double the size of the Internal Revenue Service in order to pay for their reckless tax-and-spending spree. Thune noted that the agency’s poor reputation and mismanagement of taxpayer dollars would further jeopardize the privacy of South Dakotans’ personal information.

Taffy Howard appears to be absent from Budget address.. but has time to meet with Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Interesting.  While it’s not a mandatory attendance for State Legislators, you would think the Governor’s Budget address would be a pretty important thing to attend for a member of the House Appropriations Committee. But at least according to this picture noting State Representative Taffy Howard’s seat in the legislature, it appears to be occupied by Senator Maher:

And where would we find Congressional challenger Taffy Howard instead of at her desk? For starters, it appears she was in Washington DC this week hobnobbing with Congresspersons Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene:

Rep. Howard thought it was more important to meet with Congresswoman Greene than to hear about South Dakota’s budget? Wow. What was she talking with MTG about? QAnon and Secret Jewish space lasers?

When Taffy says “Unlike my opponent, these members of Congress actually stand up for Americans and fight the insanity that goes on in DC.”  She probably should have said these members of Congress ARE the insanity that goes on in DC.

Thune, Luján Lead Fight For Cattle Producers, Demand Halt of Brazilian Fresh Beef Imports

Thune, Luján Lead Fight For Cattle Producers, Demand Halt of Brazilian Fresh Beef Imports

Senators support cattle industry’s recent requests for USDA to immediately suspend fresh beef imports from Brazil

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), members of the Senate Agriculture Committee, today led a bipartisan group of senators in expressing support for the cattle industry’s recent requests for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to immediately suspend fresh beef imports from Brazil. In 2017, Brazilian fresh beef imports were suspended due to food safety concerns, and USDA allowed these imports to resume in 2020. The senators are concerned with Brazil’s recent failure to quickly disclose two cases of atypical spongiform encephalopathy – a neurological disease of cattle – which could pose a significant threat to the health and safety of the U.S. cattle herd.

“Cattle producers across the country work hard to produce the highest quality beef in the world,” the senators wrote. “This industry should not be jeopardized by Brazilian beef imports that may contaminate U.S. herds and our food supply. We support the requests to suspend Brazilian fresh beef imports until a thorough investigation can be made into Brazil’s Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply food safety review process.”

In February 2020, Thune led a bipartisan group of his colleagues in sending a letter to USDA questioning the department’s decision to lift the U.S. ban on Brazilian beef imports.

This letter was also signed by U.S. Sens. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.).

Full letter below:

The Honorable Tom Vilsack
Secretary
U.S. Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C., 20250

Dear Secretary Vilsack:

We write to express support for the cattle industry’s recent requests for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to immediately suspend fresh beef imports from Brazil.

As you know, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is a significant concern for cattle producers and consumers, and the United States has gone to great lengths to put in place extensive interlocking safeguards to ensure our cattle producers and consumers are protected from this devastating disease.  In 2017, Brazilian fresh beef imports were suspended due to food safety concerns, and unfortunately, USDA allowed these imports to resume in 2020.

Due to a lengthy delay in the reporting of two recent atypical BSE cases, we have concerns that these events are evidence that Brazil may lack credible animal health and food safety systems. While health officials state these two atypical BSE cases arose spontaneously in the infected cattle, Brazil’s irresponsible behavior may pose a significant threat to the health and safety of the U.S. cattle herd.

We believe these concerns warrant the immediate suspension of Brazil’s fresh beef imports until a thorough review can be performed by USDA and livestock producers can be assured that Brazilian beef does not place our herds or consumers at risk from BSE or other potentially devastating livestock diseases.

Cattle producers across the country work hard to produce the highest quality beef in the world.  This industry should not be jeopardized by Brazilian beef imports that may contaminate U.S. herds and our food supply.

We support the requests to suspend Brazilian fresh beef imports until a thorough investigation can be made into Brazil’s Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply food safety review process.  Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.  We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

###

Guest Column: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act values sanctity of life by State Sen. Jessica Castleberry

Picture of Senator Jessica l. CastleberryPregnant Workers Fairness Act values sanctity of life
By State Senator Jessica Castleberry
Originally published Rapid City Journal December 4, 2021

In the midst of swirling media around modernizing abortion law in the United States, we can pause for a moment to set focus on an opportunity to stand up for families and mothers, the unborn, workers, and their employers- the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) currently making its way through the legislative process at the Federal level.

In South Dakota, we have the distinguishment of being one of 30 states with laws similar to PWFA, and pregnancy must be treated like any other temporary disability. In our state, a pregnant woman cannot be fired, refused employment, required to take leave, or treated differently as long as she can perform her job duties adequately. In addition, if other employees are given special accommodation when disabled, then a pregnant employee must also. Unfortunately, if this law is not passed at the Federal level, women in 20 other states are left without protection for themselves or their unborn children.

Studies conducted by Alexandra Cawthorne and Melissa Alpert in their report, Labor Pains: Improving Employment and Economic Security for Pregnant Women and New Mothers, indicate that three-quarters of women entering the workforce will become pregnant while employed at some point in their lives. Continued studies conducted as recently as 2019 show almost half of working mothers are the primary breadwinners of their families. The United States is facing unprecedented workforce issues, and we need to retain quality employees. This includes supporting working, pregnant mothers.

PWFA will extend the Americans with Disabilities Act, providing some of those same reasonable accommodations to pregnant women. The PWFA removes barriers that prevent working women from earning a paycheck, having a healthy baby, and helps them to preserve their own health. It also enables pregnant workers to avoid withdrawing from paid personal leave accounts before the birth of their child. By passing the PWFA, expecting mothers know they can go to work and provide for their families without risking their health, and ultimately the health of their unborn child.

The PWFA is also good for business. Employers in those twenty other states have little to no guidelines on supporting expecting mothers. The PWFA creates a clear standard that will genuinely benefit our workplaces and our families nationwide. That is why the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, among several other organizations representing small and large business, have signed on to support this bill. But, it’s not just businesses and business organizations showing public support. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has also signed on to PWFA. This bill puts conservative principles into action. Passing a law that protects the lives of mothers and babies is for anyone who values the sanctity of life at all stages.

Pregnancy is temporary. The adjustments necessary to many work environments or duties are short-term and often low-cost, like providing a stool to sit on rather than standing during a shift, allowing a pregnant worker to keep a water bottle by her workstation, or taking more frequent bathroom breaks. Providing accommodations ensures that women can work safely while pregnant instead of losing their job or being forced to use paid leave before their child is born. For anyone who has ever prepared for the arrival of a new child, this is at a time when women may need their income the most.

With tremendous bipartisan support, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act has already passed the U.S. House of Representatives 329-73, and 19-2 out of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. I hope that the U.S. Senate will see the significance of this bill and follow suit.

Senator Jessica Castleberry is a member of the South Dakota Senate and a small business owner from Rapid City.

Thune Op-Ed: ‘Build Back Better’ is Democrats’ Down Payment on Socialism


‘Build Back Better’ is Democrats’ Down Payment on Socialism
By Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.)
Fox News

You may not realize it, but Congress is in the midst of a consequential debate about the future of our country. We’re debating your future. Your family’s future. The outcome could affect generations of Americans to come.

You’ve probably heard arguments about the magnitude of the Democrats’ latest partisan spending bill and the justifiable concerns about dumping trillions of dollars (on top of the trillions that have already been spent this year) into the economy. Economists, including former Obama administration officials, have warned about the effect it would have on the already painful inflation that’s being felt by everyday families in all corners of our country.

My Republican colleagues and I believe the bill is a reckless tax-and-spending spree, and it is. But, aside from the staggering price tag and the immediate consequences of inflation-driven pain in your pocketbook, there’s more to what Democrats are trying to ram through Congress this holiday season.

The debate now is a fundamental fight about the future of our country, and an almost evenly divided Congress is about to decide how far the long arm of federal government will reach into your everyday life.

Beyond hyperbole, Democrats want to increase the federal government’s reach into nearly every step of a person’s life from cradle to grave. And if they’re successful in passing their reckless tax-and-spending spree, there will be no turning back.

The Democrats’ vision for America involves monthly allowances from the government, even to illegal immigrants. It involves Uncle Sam taking charge of your child care, which will lead to fewer options to choose from and higher costs for families. Faith-based child care providers, which 53% of working families use, would be discriminated against for government funding and put at a serious disadvantage. Taxpayers would be on the hook for paying for union membership dues, and consumers would be discriminated against if buying nonunion assembled electric vehicles.

More and more Americans would rely on an expanded welfare state, receiving handouts without work requirements. Entitlement programs that are already facing insolvency would be expanded even further, jeopardizing the safety net millions of Americans rely on and our country’s long-term financial stability.

If Democrats have their way, workers can expect slower wage growth as job-creators are forced to pay more in taxes. Families can expect higher taxes, higher prices and a more intrusive IRS that would loom large over law-abiding Americans as Democrats scramble to try and pay for this unneeded spending spree. Imagine that – purportedly paying for a partisan tax-and-spending spree by making the IRS bigger and more powerful than it already is.

And then there’s the Green New Deal-style policies. Democrats would like the government to pick and choose the energy sources for your home and your car. If you think gas is expensive now, and it is, just wait until the Democrats’ policies further drive up the cost of electricity, natural gas and gasoline – all while subsidizing Democrats’ preferred green technologies.

I will continue to support renewable energy and increased energy innovation and efficiency, but America is still going to rely on liquid fuels for the foreseeable future. It’s just a fact, for which consumers and the economy shouldn’t be punished by the Democrats’ policies.

And at a time when businesses are struggling to find workers, Democrats want to provide government jobs, tuition and loan assistance, and other benefits for climate activists. Billions of taxpayer dollars would be spent on “tree equity,” “urban agriculture,” “environmental justice programs” for schools and other progressive pet projects that amount to slush funds for cities.

This vision for our country runs counter to everything Republicans – and I believe a majority of Americans – stand for, which is why not one single Republican will support the Democrats’ down payment on socialism.

We believe in letting people keep more of their hard-earned money and limiting the government’s power and control. We want a future where an individual’s outcome is determined by their work ethic, not bureaucrats and “we-know-best” Democrats in Washington, D.C.

At the most basic level, Republicans want to create an environment that encourages economic opportunity for all – as a party, we believe there is dignity and value in work for families, communities and the economy.

Thankfully, this radical vision for America can be stopped in its tracks today. All it would take is one brave Senate Democrat who would be willing to stand up and save the country from this partisan spending bill’s enormous cost on the economy, our future and Americans’ freedom.

Any Democrat could pick from a long menu of reasons to oppose it, and he or she would be doing the country a great service.

###