South Dakota Democrats announce this AM that they are in such dire condition they have to close their doors.

South Dakota Democrats have apparently announced that they’re giving up all pretenses of being an organized political party after the recent disclosures of their mismanagement and financial issues. From a post by Cory Heidelberger at Dakota Free Press:

In reviewing our budget, the biggest operating expenses are attributed to the office rent in Sioux Falls and Rapid City. Therefore, we have made the necessary decision to close both offices within the next month and staff will begin work remotely. We anticipate this being temporary until we are in a better financial position. [SDDP chair Paula Hawks, e-mail, 2019.08.29].

Read that here.

Given the fact that they are already in the hole by over 46k, are facing a massive fine and will likely have to forfeit over 20K as a result of their FEC Audit, “until we are in a better financial position” might be a really, really long time.

And I’m still wondering why they still have the same treasurer in charge that they’ve had for past decade who was at the helm of the “numerous issues with SDDP finances.”

Update..

Any guesses whether the Argus will finally find the problems Dems have with their finances “newsworthy”

15 thoughts on “South Dakota Democrats announce this AM that they are in such dire condition they have to close their doors.”

  1. Well good for them. Paula walked into a huge mess and it seems like she’s trying to cut at least some expenses.

    1. Right — it’s a reasonable cost-cutting move & an appropriate response to dire financial straits. I don’t fault the SDDP for (at long last) working to become more efficient. Can the party “do more with less?” We’ll see.

    1. I don’t; we used to pick up the Sunday edition on a regular basis, but we even stopped that. The Argus has become a daily pamphlet, and I don’t see how it stays in business.

  2. Stacy Burnette is a total disaster. All she cares about is transgender issues. They should fire her next

  3. This will ultimately hurt the SD Republican party in the long run. When everyone is a republican, no one is a republican. The scope will be broadened and now you are going to have to fight pointing out who is more Republican because everyone will have an opinion on what that is and they will all be under the same umbrella.

  4. We progressives see this as a minor set back as my friend Cory points out. I may have to use my influence with future president Kamala Harris to include the SDDP in the big reparations package after the Blue Wave.

  5. Does it really surprise anyone that the Dems can’t manage money? Look at the financial state of Chicago, hell, look at the financial state of every state they control. They are all in the sh*ts. The party of abortion and assisted suicide is literally dying . . . and it can’t happen too quickly as far as I’m concerned.

    1. Ummm. I hate to be the Debbie downer but more blue states are “givers”, while many red states are “takers”, including South Dakota.

    2. Tax breaks for billionaires, tariffs for Joe 6-Pack, deficit ballooning to unfathomable levels, bashing YOUR OWN PICK at the Fed, and 6 bankruptcies. Pardon me if I don’t hitch my wagon to that particular (reality show) star.

  6. Updated Aug. 29, 2019 8:53 pm ET
    CHICAGO—Mayor Lori Lightfoot warned that residents needed to be prepared for hard choices to tackle an $838 million budget hole, the largest in the city’s recent history.

    On Thursday evening, Ms. Lightfoot, who in May became the first black woman and first gay mayor of Chicago, said she was open to every possibility for closing the gap. But she said she wanted to avoid hurting low-income residents or risk driving away businesses with overly burdensome taxes.

  7. As long as the SDDP latches on to Cory Heidelberger it will fail. Cory has ruined the SDDP, good job Cory.

    1. I agree. Visited with many in the SDDP and former that now register as Independents and they said the same thing.

  8. Kudos, Anonymous: “This will ultimately hurt the SD Republican party in the long run. When everyone is a republican, no one is a republican. The scope will be broadened and now you are going to have to fight pointing out who is more Republican because everyone will have an opinion on what that is and they will all be under the same umbrella.” SPOT ON. Here are related sentiments published in recent years that also ring true:
    “First, most South Dakota legislators are not truly “elected.” Very few face a competitive general election to get into office. And legislators who don’t face a general election contest tend to be answerable to their party, not the electorate.
    • Second, Republicans in South Dakota are a minority of the state’s registered voters, but the party holds all the cards. While only 46 percent of the registered voters in the state are Republican, all taxpayers pay for their primary, which has become the most important election in the state. Republican’s hold 85 percent of the seats in the legislature.
    • Third, most South Dakotans are underrepresented in our state legislature. Democrats are 31 percent of the registered voters in the state and independents are 22 percent. Together they represent 53 percent of our electorate. Democrats hold only 15 percent of the legislative seats. Independents are completely unrepresented in legislature. Something is obviously wrong with that.
    • Fourth, a one-party legislature is inherently weak. For those of us who appreciate the checks and balances provided by the two-party system, this comes as no surprise. A vocal minority party can play an essential role when government screws up.”
    The exact numbers/percentages may have changed since this was published in late ’16, but the essence of the above message is still credible.
    I think the SDRP is like a powerhouse football team with a bionic arm quarterback and a terminator defensive line . . . . and no other team(s) to play against. They can chest bump all they want, but without any opponents to test their mettle, they’re just a bunch of empty (team) suits with untested/unsubstantiated “talent”.

Comments are closed.