Campaign kicks off against IM28; measure would remove taxes on tobacco, vaping
From facebook, the campaign has kicked off against Initiated Measure 28, with State Representative Taylor Rehfeldt taking part:
From facebook, the campaign has kicked off against Initiated Measure 28, with State Representative Taylor Rehfeldt taking part:

Johnson Bill Reforms Indian Health Service
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) reintroduced the Restoring Accountability in the Indian Health Service Act of 2024 to improve quality and delivery of patient care.
Due to a lack of oversight, financial integrity, staffing needs, and employee shortcomings at the Indian Health Service (IHS), tribal patients have been receiving substandard care for far too long.
“Tribal communities deserve access to efficient, safe, and high-quality care through the IHS,” said Johnson. “This bill would bring necessary changes to improve the quality of service and care for tribal members.
Background:
The Restoring Accountability in the Indian Health Service Act of 2024 seeks to improve the delivery of care for Native Americans relying on IHS by promoting the recruitment and retention of staff, best practices on information-sharing, cultural awareness, and accountability. Specifically, the bill:
U.S. Senators John Barrasso (R-W.Y.) and John Thune (R-S.D.) are leading similar legislation in the Senate.
A full text of the legislation can be found here.
###
Now that I’m done traveling for a few weeks, I can get to a few things that I’ve been planning to touch on. First and foremost are the June FEC Reports from the two main political parties in the state. And they tell different tales.
First up is the June FEC report from the SDGOP:
June 2024 Sdgop Fec by Pat Powers on Scribd
The SDGOP has a couple of donations in to the federal account, from Katie Washnok for $1041.02 and Toby Doeden for $5000; I’m guessing for SDGOP convention sponsorships. Otherwise, there’s a significant void of donations going into the federal account. $6789.55 in direct funds including those two, and another $10,162.00 from what I’m guessing is the state account. They spent $8057.23 during this period, which I’m guessing means bills have not come in from convention, or they rolled through the state account, leaving the SDGOP $39,473.88 to move into the fall.
Now, South Dakota Democrats:
June 2024 Sddp Fec by Pat Powers on Scribd
Democrats appear to be rolling some federal campaign donations through the account this month for people who have maxed out otherwise, including $10,000 from George Soros. The big total is $719,297.80 in total donations, with $707,041.89 back out the door. But, they got to grab a little bit of that cash on the way by for the privilege of parking it in their account. (Before you get your shorts in a twist, GOP does that too).
The total left over is $65,182.08 to put towards candidates and party building.
The big take away? Look at the number of pages in those reports. 12 versus 196. And that mainly comes from the number of people donating.
Dems are boasting around 100 or so donations that came out of South Dakota. Maybe not all large amounts, but there are enough of them who are engaged, involved and donating. And the inter-party chaos that the GOP is suffering from right now is hardening the hearts and closing the wallets of people who want to fund party efforts.
Might not be a big deal on one report, but the cumulative effect is going to come back and bite someone in the tail eventually.
Stay tuned.
The Argus Leader apparently does NOT like losing their taxpayer funded welfare, and has brought a lawsuit to try to claw back legal notice publication for the City of Sioux Falls, which they lost to competitor The Dakota Scout several weeks back:
On June 5, the City Council approved the Dakota Scout, a publication with a weekly printed newspaper founded by two former Argus Leader reporters and in operation since August 2022, to serve as the official newspaper of Sioux Falls for the purpose of publishing legal notices starting July 1. The council had two newspapers to choose from, with several councilors citing that cost savings and local ownership played a part in their decision to vote in favor of the Dakota Scout’s plan, though circulation and overall reach in the community is larger for the Argus Leader.
and..
According to the Secretary of State’s website, the Dakota Scout filed its newspaper ownership and circulation statements June 26, meaning the earliest the weekly could obtain legal newspaper status is 2025.
Therefore, the Argus Leader argues the Dakota Scout does not qualify to publish the city’s legal notices at this time.
Get your popcorn out.
Frankly, the legislature should require all official newspapers to be physically published in South Dakota to be honored with that status. But, we’ll see how this goes.

A Celebration of Freedom
By: Governor Kristi Noem
July 5, 2024
The Fourth of July has always been a special day to me. It’s our nation’s birthday, of course. But it’s also the day that my husband, Bryon, proposed.
On July 4th, 1991, I told a group of kiddos that I would haul them and their horses to the local parade. I picked up the kids, helped polish their horses, and led them through the parade route. By the end of the day, I was exhausted.
I wanted to clean up and a enjoy a night at home after my long day. However, Bryon insisted on taking me out to dinner and going on his grandpa’s boat to watch the fireworks.
I was cold and miserable on that boat. The fireworks began, and when I turned around, Bryon was on one knee. “Kristi, will you marry me?” he asked.
I was shocked and responded with the first thing that came to mind: “Did…you ask my dad?”
That day was certainly a day of celebration for Bryon and me! And the Fourth of July is a day for all Americans to celebrate. It’s a day that epitomizes Freedom and unity.
Nearly 250 years ago, our Founding Fathers took unprecedented action to declare independence from unwarranted British authority and a tyrannical king. They took on the strongest military in the world with nothing but personal muskets and rifles. And they gave us the greatest gift in human history – a Republic where the people rule.
Just as our forefathers worked tirelessly to create a better future, we too must continue to strive for liberty and uphold the values that make South Dakota and America great. On July 1st, several bills that I prioritized for the people of South Dakota this past legislative session finally became law!
One of these laws is crucial to protecting our state’s precious ag land. Agriculture is the backbone of South Dakota’s economy, but evil foreign governments are attempting to control land across our nation. But not in South Dakota – not on my watch. By safeguarding our land, we are preserving our heritage and securing our future.
I further recognize that our Freedom extends to all Americans. So, I signed a bill that clearly defines antisemitism and helps ensure the safety of Jewish people in our state. Antisemitism has no place in South Dakota, and this law sends a clear message that we stand united against antisemitic hate.
I am also proud of the efforts we have made to give individuals with criminal histories a second chance. It is crucial to provide individuals with the opportunity to rebuild their lives and support their families after serving their sentences. People who are ready to reenter society will now be able to provide for their families and add value to our workforce.
Finally, our kids are the future. And our teachers are the ones we trust to help them achieve that future. We ensured that our teachers will receive adequate pay for the important work they do. We are empowering educators to inspire the next generation of citizens with the ideals of democracy and independence.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday this Fourth of July, let us remember what America was founded on – Freedom. This session’s legislative successes are a testament to our commitment to making South Dakota a model for Freedom.
Freedom is something we cannot take for granted. It’s something we must fight to uphold. As Ben Franklin famously said after signing the Declaration of Independence on that fateful 4th of July almost 250 years ago, “We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we will all hang separately.”
Let us, like our Founding Fathers, work together to secure a future for the next generation. Happy Fourth of July, South Dakota! God bless you all, and God bless the United States of America.
###
From Facebook, it looks like one Democrat is down.. although within the time allotted for being replaced on the ballot:

From Facebook, State Rep. Fred Deutsch who was not successful in moving to the State Senate this last month offers his thoughts on the recount process, as well as his support for our current system of electronic ballot counting:

POST-ELECTION THOUGHTS: Because so many friends and supporters asked me to go through the election recount, I opted to oblige. Six different recount committees were established, one in each county in my District.
As far as the process, each ballot was individually reviewed by the committee, along with simultaneous review by me and my opponent. They were then hand-counted, and then fed into the tabulator machine.
The hand-count, the tabulator count, and the Election Day tabulator count all matched in each county except for a few voter errors (e.g. one voter put a check mark in the oval instead of filling it in). As a result, I gained a single vote – – not near enough to impact the results.
There are some people in our state who are concerned with the accuracy of these machines. After going through this pain-staking process looking at each ballot, I have zero concerns about accuracy.
Six different machines with six different auditors were all bulls-eye accurate each time, except for a few human errors.
I’m grateful the process exists to allow candidates to request recounts in close elections, and I’m grateful to the people in each county (18 people total) who gave up time to make sure our election was accurate. The entire process was professional and transparent, and frankly made me proud to be a South Dakotan.
Federal Parole Commission Denies Parole Request For Leonard Peltier in Shooting Deaths of Two FBI Agents
PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces the federal Parole Commission has denied the parole request for Leonard Peltier, who was convicted of killing two FBI agents on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in 1975.
Peltier is serving two consecutive life sentences for the fatal shooting of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams. The murders occurred on June 26, 1975 when the two agents were on the reservation to arrest a man on a federal warrant. During his trial, an eyewitness testified that, shortly after the shooting, Peltier had bragged “about killing the agents.”
Attorney General Jackley sent a letter to the Parole Commission this spring objecting to Peltier’s parole request. Attorney General Jackley was the prosecuting attorney that examined a trial witness regarding Peltier’s confession in Marlon Brandon’s motorhome to American Indian Movement leader Anna Mae Aquash. Peltier’s confession ultimately led to her execution by John Graham who was found guilty of her murder. See State v. Graham, 815_N.W.2d_295 (SD 2012).
“Leonard Peltier murdered two FBI agents in cold blood, and he has never shown any remorse for these murders,” said Attorney General Jackley. “The two FBI agents, who died in the line of duty, and their loved ones deserve justice, and parole for Peltier is not justice.”
More than 30 members of Congress have written President Biden asking clemency for Peltier. Attorney General Jackley said he will write to the President as well, requesting that clemency be denied.
-30-
From today in the Dakota Scout:
“Transparency is the inoculation to conspiracy theories.”
– Rick Weible to the Minnehaha County Commission.
Also Rick Weible:
“The fact is that I’ve now shown you this piece of evidence, I understand that my life is at risk, and that the United States does not want this to be known.”
– Rick Weible, March 19, 2024 to the Brookings County Commission.
Rick must know that they’re watching him..
All bills passed by the state legislature that were signed into law, except those that included an emergency clause to go into effect earlier, took effect July 1. According to South Dakota Law:
2-14-16. Effective date of legislative acts.
Subject to the provisions of the Constitution and statutes relating to vetoes and the referendum, an act of the Legislature which does not prescribe when it shall take effect, if passed at a regular session, takes effect on the first day of July after its passage and if passed at a special session on the ninety–first day after the final adjournment of such session.
This would include Senate Bill 201, which had a number of petition signatures turned in last week to refer that measure to a vote. What South Dakota law states about those bills notes:
2-1-3. Referendum–Laws subject to petition–Form.
Any law which the Legislature may have enacted, except one that may be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, shall, upon the filing of a petition as provided in this chapter, be submitted to a vote of the electors of the state at the next general election.
and..
2-1-3.1. Referred law–Petition–Filing deadline–Contents–Signatures–Circulator handout.
The petition must be filed with the secretary of state within ninety days after the adjournment of the Legislature that passed the referred law. A sworn affidavit, signed by at least two-thirds of the petition sponsors, stating that the documents filed constitute the entire petition and to the best of the knowledge of the sponsors contains a sufficient number of signatures, must also be filed with the secretary of state.
Now, here’s a good question. What happens when a petition, filed to refer a law that passed in the preceding legislature, is not validated by July 1, the date the law takes effect? Because one law says the measure has taken effect, and others allow it to go to a vote of the people.
And here we sit unaware of whether the petitions were able – or unable – to be validated on a timely basis.