Rounds: $15 Minimum Wage Would Damage Our Economy By Killing 1.4 Million Jobs

Rounds: $15 Minimum Wage Would Damage Our Economy By Killing 1.4 Million Jobs

WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) today issued the following statement after the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a report detailing the devastating impacts of President Biden’s proposed $15 minimum wage increase.

“As a former governor and business owner, I understand how important economic policies are in making sure businesses have opportunities to grow and create jobs.

“President Biden continues to embrace a radical left-wing agenda by pushing policies like a $15 federal minimum wage, which would kill an estimated 1.4 million American jobs and damage our economy.

“In South Dakota, I’ve already talked to several small business owners who have indicated they will be forced to cut staff just to stay open should this drastic hike to the minimum wage take place.

“We are in the middle of a pandemic. Our businesses have faced enough hardship already. We don’t need to add additional injury. Our goal should be to enact business-friendly policies that promote economic growth and job creation.”

###

Freedom of religion bill attacked by group promoting LGBT rights

A measure designed to preserve and recognize the rights of churches to operate on the same level as secular groups and businesses was attacked by a group promoting LGBT rights in the legislature this week:

“This bill represents a dangerous attempt to enshrine discrimination into state law by creating a legal mechanism to privilege some religious beliefs over the well being of all South Dakotans,” the letter said.

and..

Schoenbeck said he was surprised to learn Tuesday that the national group opposed the bill.

“I just got to tell you, I find it offensive when people play the LBGTQ-whatever card, or race card, or any of that kind of garbage, instead of dealing with the merits of what’s before you,” Schoenbeck told the committee. “And what’s before you is a bill that does nothing to discriminate, except to protect people and the free exercise of their religion.”

Read the entire story here.

The bill was brought because some are treating churches differently (and more restrictively) than businesses in terms of COVID restrictions.

And last time I checked, that’s against the Constitution.

Johnson Secures Top Republican Position on Livestock Subcommittee

Johnson Secures Top Republican Position on Livestock Subcommittee

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) announced his appointment as the top Republican on the House Agriculture Committee’s Livestock & Foreign Agriculture Subcommittee. Johnson is the first Northern Plains congressman to be selected as top Republican of this subcommittee in nearly 40 years.

“Ranching and raising livestock often gets less attention in DC than it deserves,” said Johnson. “It’s been almost 40 years since the top Republican on the livestock subcommittee has been from the Northern Plains. I’m looking forward to highlighting the challenges and opportunities facing South Dakota’s small feeders and cow-calf operators.”

“Dusty Johnson has been a great friend and fearless fighter for agriculture,” said Rep. Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson, Republican Leader of the House Agriculture Committee. “He’s proven himself time and time again as an advocate for farm families and I’m pleased to have him on my team as Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture.”

The Subcommittee on Livestock & Foreign Agriculture has jurisdiction over the policies, statutes, and markets relating to all livestock, poultry, dairy, and seafood, including all products thereof; the inspection, marketing, and promotion of such commodities and products; aquaculture; animal welfare; grazing; foreign agricultural assistance and trade promotion.

###

Governor Noem and Legislative Leaders Announce Plan for Implementation of IM 26

Governor Noem and Legislative Leaders Announce Plan for Implementation of IM 26

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, Governor Kristi Noem and leadership in both chambers of the South Dakota state legislature announced a plan to implement Initiated Measure 26 (IM 26).

“We are working diligently to get IM 26 implemented safely and correctly,” said Governor Kristi Noem. “The feasibility of getting this program up and running well will take additional time. I am thankful to our legislative leaders for helping make sure that we do this right.”

The plan would add a year of additional flexibility on the implementation timeline and create an interim committee to meet and recommend solutions before next legislative session.

The state of South Dakota has consulted with industry experts Cannabis Public Policy Consulting (CPPC). CPPC has not seen a successful implementation of a medicinal marijuana program in just 8 months, the timeframe IM 26 currently requires. Some states take more than two years for successful implementation. To address this, the implementation plan adds additional flexibility to the timeline. This will allow the State of South Dakota to address several policy concerns and additional rules regarding IM 26.

“Our Senate leadership fully supports the effort to properly implement a workable medical marijuana program,” said Senate Majority Leader Gary Cammack. “We will honor the voters’ wishes.”

Furthermore, CPPC advises that no state in the country has ever implemented both a medicinal and a recreational marijuana program simultaneously. While the circuit court has ruled that Amendment A is unconstitutional, the state is still anticipating that the Supreme Court will have the opportunity to weigh in on this constitutional matter.

“There is no doubt that IM 26 passed in South Dakota, and it is fully our intention to honor the will of the voters,” said House Majority Leader Kent Peterson. “Based upon the experiences of other states, we know that it takes time to start implementing a safe and workable program. We will get the job done.”

Special Address: Update on Revenue Numbers

Special Address: Update on Revenue Numbers
By: Governor Kristi Noem 
February 9, 2021

Lieutenant Governor Rhoden, Mr. Speaker, members of the House and Senate, and my fellow South Dakotans.

I am here today because South Dakota is in a historic position. I stood before you two months ago and said, South Dakota is entering 2021 in one of the strongest financial positions in the country.

I told you, South Dakota wouldn’t be raising taxes on our citizens or our businesses. We wouldn’t be borrowing billions of dollars to cover our budget shortfalls. And we wouldn’t be looking to Congress to send us more stimulus money.

As I stand before you today, I am pleased to report that our position is even stronger than we previously thought.

Before I go into the details, we should remember how we got here.

I believe it was our commitment to conservative principles that put us in the position that we’re in today. It was our respect for the rights of the people. It was our commonsense conservative values and the principles we hold dear in America. In short, it was our trust and respect for the people who we serve.

Going forward, we should trust this model and continue to stay true to what we believe in. As I said in December, we need to remain prudent and conservative as we look to adopt a budget. We must remember that these dollars are not ours. They belong to our constituents, to the incredible people who have made this opportunity possible in the first place.

Additionally, I also want to urge you to be cautious. Remember, we will face new challenges as a result of the policies of the current administration in Washington. We’ve already seen the consequences of President Biden’s energy policy on some South Dakota communities that were hoping to capitalize on the Keystone XL pipeline. And there are several other policies that could hurt our future economic position by driving up energy prices and pushing more costly regulations.

If we learn from the lessons of the last year and continue to apply them in all our decision making, I firmly believe we can keep our state in a strong position far into the future.

South Dakota is in the position that we are today because of the principled approach that we took over the last year. As states across the country were shutting down, South Dakota remained open.

Our economy is thriving. We have the lowest unemployment rate in the country – lower than it was before the pandemic. Families and businesses are relocating to our state – we’re 4th in the nation for inbound migration, according to United Van Lines. And we’re a national leader in distribution of the COVID vaccine. By all accounts, that is the best way that we can have success against the virus over the long-term.

I want to encourage you to trust our principles and carefully consider how best to use one-time funds. We need to focus on solving long-term problems and strengthening our state for the next generation. First, we should put money aside into savings and investments so that we protect the next generation from higher taxes or drastic spending cuts in the future. Second, we should pay down debt and remove future liabilities. And third, we should use these funds to improve and restore our state’s infrastructure.

Remember, not long after the 2008 financial crisis and the resulting federal stimulus funding, our state faced 10% budget cuts to make ends meet. With that recent historical context in mind, we must remain disciplined and save for the future, whatever it may look like.

The fiscal policies that we are seeing from the federal government are not sustainable. South Dakota needs to be prepared for whatever may come.

So let’s get into the numbers. The appropriations committee will be adopting revenue estimates this week. They will hear projections from the Bureau of Finance and Management, as well as the Legislative Research Council. But I’m going to give you a preview now.

We are continuing to see increased revenues above what I discussed with you in December.

The growth rates that we are seeing are historic. There has been 11% growth in our ongoing revenue this year. I want to put that number in context.

When you account for changes in taxes and fees, the state has likely never seen this kind of growth in its ongoing revenue. We looked back thirty years and believe this is unprecedented.

We are projecting an additional $8.6 million in ongoing revenue for FY 2022. This is on top of the $61 million that we previously reported to you. We are also forecasting about $51.5 million in one-time revenues in FY 2021. This is above my recommended budget.

In addition to this money, we believe we can utilize another $74 million dollars. The one-year extension of Coronavirus Relief Funds enables this flexibility. Previously, my budget proposed that this money come from general funds. For example, we can now plan to utilize $25 million in CRF money on my broadband proposal instead of general funds. So for broadband: $75 million from general funds and $25 million from CRF. This is just one example of how we can capitalize on CRF flexibilities.

To summarize, between the $51 million in one-time revenues and the additional $74 from CRF flexibilities, we could have approximately $125 million in one-time money that we were not previously anticipating.

Though it is tempting to assume that our current growth will continue, I urge you all to hold true to our conservative ideals. History tells us that this dramatic growth could decline once the effects of federal stimulus wear off.

Along those lines, I want to highlight the importance of putting some of this money into savings and investments.

In 2001, our trust funds brought in $12 million in annual proceeds. In 2022, we forecast that number will grow to more than $43 million. That is an increase of 350 percent. This is how we set the state up for long-term success. It is important to remember what this number represents. In the past, we have invested money by putting it into trust funds, and today we have an additional $43 million that we do not take from our people in taxes. This is why I proposed putting at least $50 million dollars into the trust funds in my December budget and why I am encouraging you all to adopt that proposal.

I’ve told you many times that my mission is to make South Dakota safer, stronger, and healthier for our kids and grandkids. To do that, we need to take this perspective: whatever action we take with this money needs to fix something for 20 to 30 years or longer. That is why I am proposing important infrastructure investments like broadband, the Brittle Fund, dam repair, and radio tower equipment. It is also why we would like to set up a needs-based scholarship endowment that will sustainably fund itself long into the future.

That is why I am also focused on the Dakota Events Complex, which will set Huron up for long-term success. And that is also why we are making our state aircraft safer by selling two of our three old planes and replacing them with one newer plane.

In short, we need to view our budget an opportunity to invest in infrastructure, cut long-term expenses, and bolster our savings and investments.

South Dakota’s future is very bright. But we have faced real challenges this year. And we will face more in the future. To safeguard against unforeseen economic setbacks, we must continue to take a prudent and conservative approach to state government. We need to carefully consider our present unusual circumstances as we project revenue.

It was President Eisenhower, in his farewell address, who warned us to avoid the impulse of living only for today. He spoke candidly about how wrong it would be to mortgage the future of our grandchildren because it would lead to the loss of their political and spiritual heritage. He said, “We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.”

Together, our actions can capitalize on the unique opportunity that our state faces and set us up for tremendous success in the future. We must remember the steps that we took that got us here in the first place.

Our state motto: “Under God, the people rule,” is an important reminder for all of us here today. Let’s leave this chamber as responsible stewards of the hard-earned taxpayer dollars of the PEOPLE of South Dakota.

Today’s revenue numbers are good news. We are where we are today because South Dakota respects freedom, personal responsibility, and conservative governance.

It is my hope that we can keep working together to build and grow our state. And that we can keep our focus where it counts: on strong families. Remember, strong families lead to strong communities. And strong communities will build an even stronger South Dakota.

God bless you all. Thank you.

###

 

Woki-leaks website takes on “Woke” culture on USD Campus and in State University System

A new South Dakota website has been created in the spirit of disclosure.. but this time it’s not disclosing high government secrets, rather something this website has written about on occasion – the University of South Dakota’s “woke” culture, and how it has a tendency to go a bit overboard sometimes.

The “Woki-Leaks South Dakota” website bills itself as “Exposing the Social Justice Crusade at USD,” and already has several articles up addressing what they see as a serious problem in Vermillion. For Example:

The first thing to know is that USD’s official values of “diversity and inclusiveness” do not mean what most people think they mean. According to USD’s Woke activists – and to the University itself[1] – advancing “diversity and inclusiveness” means accepting that the United States is a systemically racist and oppressive society in which “the privileged” (e.g., White, straight men) enjoy unfair advantage, and “the marginalized” (e.g., racial minorities, women, sexual minorities) are continually held back and disempowered.

and..

To force students, faculty, and staff to comply with their wishes, the activists are stating openly that they and their administrative allies should be given the power they need to, as they put it, “Manage the varied internal and external forces (‘the perfect storm’) that seek to disrupt [diversity and inclusion] efforts or constrain the inclusive environment we aim to foster on USDs campus.”[7] In other words, anyone not on board with the Woke is an enemy, and the activists ought to be given the power to “manage” them.

Read the entire article (What “Diversity and Inclusiveness” Really Means at USD: Power for the Woke) here.

(Given the degree of footnoting on the site, I have a suspicion that this might be coming from an inside academic)

The website urges to advocate wokism reform for USD…

It is completely inappropriate for the University of South Dakota to embrace Wokism, Social Justice ideology, critical race theory, intersectionalism, or any other narrow political doctrine as an official University belief system – period. USD needs outside help to reform itself at this point. The University of South Dakota is a publicly-funded institution. It should be, and is, accountable to citizens and their elected political leaders. Fortunately, South Dakota lawmakers and Governor Noem have already demonstrated that they are willing to act to protect intellectual diversity and free speech at the university. If they see the citizens of South Dakota stand up and demand change, reform will be possible. The following are things you can do to help make sure that USD reembraces common sense, moderation, and political neutrality – and that Wokism does not take over additional state universities.

Read that here.

… and in particular, urges people to follow legislation designed to prevent political bias and indoctrination at USD and other state universities.

You can follow the website here at Woki-Leaks South Dakota.

SDDP Exec Director Pam Cole leaving Dem Party Job. SDGOP very sorry to see her go.

Pam (Merchant) Cole is apparently leaving her position as Executive Director at the South Dakota Democrat Party at the end of February, according to the Rapid City Journal:

“Pam’s efforts and passion for the party got us through a challenging time and put us on the right path going forward. I’m grateful for her dedication and wish her well in her future pursuits,” said Senate Minority Leader Troy Heinert.

Read that all here.

I know I can speak for many members of the South Dakota Republican Party that after trimming their legislative numbers to 3 Democrat State Senators and 8 Democrat State Representatives, we’re very sorry to see her go.

She was a “valuable” contributor to the success of the SDGOP’s efforts.

Plaintiff’s Statement on Amendment A being found unconstitutional

From Facebook:

“Pennington County, SD – Pennington County Sheriff Kevin Thom and South Dakota Highway Patrol Superintendent Col. Rick Miller are pleased by the decision of Circuit Judge Christina Klinger on the legal challenge to Amendment A. Today the Hughes County judge agreed with Sheriff Thom, Col. Miller, and South Dakota citizens who overwhelmingly voted to pass Amendment Z in 2018 to protect our state constitution.

“The judge’s ruling today solidifies the protections that were sought in the previous passing of Amendment Z.” Sheriff Thom continues, “It is an honor to defend our state constitution, and I appreciate the judge ruling in our favor today.”
Additionally, the judge ruled that the process to modify the constitution was improper as it was a revision to the constitution rather than an amendment.

“I am pleased with the court’s decision today, though I realize that the Supreme Court will likely have the opportunity to address our constitutional concerns on their merits,” says Col. Miller.

The plaintiffs’ arguments focus on the unconstitutional drafting and proposal of this issue as a constitutional amendment. First, they cite this clause in Article XXIII Sec. 1. of the South Dakota Constitution: “A proposed amendment may amend one or more articles and related subject matter in other articles as necessary to accomplish the objectives of the amendment; however, no proposed amendment may embrace more than one subject.”

Second, the pleadings emphasize that Amendment A is a Constitutional Revision rather than a Constitutional Amendment, and thus was passed via an unconstitutional process.

Given that this matter faces additional litigation given the likelihood of an appeal to the South Dakota Supreme Court, neither Sheriff Thom nor Col. Miller will be making further comment.”

More on Amendment A being shot down…

Joe Sneve at the Argus Leader has some of the same information I’d gotten wind of earlier:

Circuit Court Judge Christina Klinger in a decision issued Monday ruled that Constitutional Amendment A violates the state Constitution on two grounds: It violates single subject rule, meaning it encompassed more than one topic; and it conflicts with language in the Constitution that provides for its modification.

Read Joe Sneve’s story here.